Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

I noticed that they added a `LICENSE-ModelWeights.txt`! Maybe I should dive into their repo deeper and follow their good practices.

Thanks a lot for the advice! It really helps!



sort by: page size:

When you run that command, where does it download the model weights from?

No that's what I was getting at. For roughly half the models I come across, the weights are published on HF. For the other half, the weights are available via GitHub (either the releases section, or a link to something like Google Drive).

How are the model weights licensed?

When you download the weights is it in a github with a LICENCE file or some other agreement? Most likely the reason is yes. If you don't understand I would try to email the person if you can use it.

Companies deal with this probably since they have their own data and probably would either need a custom solution or if it is relatively easy to do they would use a third party. (clarfai).


They actually reimplemented the code to load the model. But it’s not clear if the weights of the model are free to use or not

Weights are like binaries. They are not code. It would make more sense to put it under a creative commons license

The model code is Apache 2.0, the weights are proprietary.

If you want to live on the legal edge, it’s unclear whether there is any copyright in model weights (since they don’t have human authorship), so just wait for someone to post the weights someplace where you can get them without agreeing to the license.

If it's based on LLaMA, aren't these weights just some sort of "patch" for the initial model, which is licensed under a restrictive license?

Or is this work "transferable" to other LLMs, once they become available?


The weights are literally linked in the article. The license is Apache 2.0

https://huggingface.co/lightonai/alfred-40b-0723/tree/main


Not an expert, but often weights are mentioned as not being open sourced. Happy to get corrected, as I'm not really sure.

It's not clear that model weights are copyrightable in the US. Maybe they revoke the license, but I assert that I don't need a license.

Except people modify "non open source" but "weights available" models all the time.

In fact, this very model is such modification (fine tune) of the original base model.


But even if you could copyright them, once you do some fine-tuning, they are not the same model weights!

Good point.

I put the weights into a separate file.


Likes:

* Super easy setup

* One-click download and load models/weights

* Works great

Dislikes:

* throws weights (in Windows) in /users/username/.cache in a proprietary directory structure, eating up tens of gigs without telling you or letting you share them with other clients

* won't let you import models you download yourself

* Search function is terrible

* I hate how it deals with instance settings


Code is MIT, weights are under the NC license for now.

Probably the model weight files

you don't need access to the weights though, unless I missed something? this is akin to the various groups using GPT-3.5/4 to generate data for fine-tuning smaller models
next

Legal | privacy