Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

This matches the "cut infra cost by 1` billion" demand he made as well - https://www.reuters.com/technology/musk-orders-twitter-cut-i...


sort by: page size:

Would you mind explaining this a bit further? I'm out of the loop here and don't know anything about Twitter's costs before or after Musk's purchase.


From a separate NYT article:

Last year, Twitter’s interest expense was about $50 million. With the new debt taken on in the deal, that will now balloon to about $1 billion a year. Yet the company’s operations last year generated about $630 million in cash flow to meet its financial obligations.

That means that Twitter is generating less money per year than what it owes its lenders. The company also does not appear to have a lot of extra cash on hand. While it had about $6 billion in cash before Mr. Musk’s buyout, a large portion of that probably went into the cost of closing the acquisition.

...

To make ends meet, Mr. Musk probably has to slash costs — by a lot. Over the weekend, he was said to be already moving to do so by ordering job cuts across Twitter. One investor who put less than $1 million in the buyout of the company said he was told by the head of Mr. Musk’s family office to expect that around 50 percent of Twitter’s 7,500 employees would be laid off.

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/10/30/technology/elon-musk-twit...


More expensive for Twitter - the company, rather than Musk and his palls.

>Making no judgements on whether thats a good thing, but Twitter will become a 'Musk Company". And like other Musk company's, he will cut costs until the company is 'break-even

Isn't that how purchasing companies works?


Except that the financing he used to buy Twitter require him to double net revenue immediately[0]. It's not clear he can cut expenses by more than 50% without negatively impacting revenue.

And that's before a massive drop[1] coming from how badly he's handled the acquisition, as well as his personal reputation.

0. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/10/30/technology/elon-musk-twit...

1. https://nypost.com/2022/11/04/elon-musk-says-twitter-has-see...


75% cut was clearly communicated to investors: https://apnews.com/article/elon-musk-twitter-inc-technology-...

Probably zero.

Musk paid 44B for Twitter.

This was with some loans and some equity sold.

Generously, Twitter was worth half what he paid, 22B at the time he took over, given the decline in the market from when the Twitter tender offer was made.

$13B in loans $7.1B from equity investors (did they have a liquidation preference?)

How much has he degraded the value by scaring away all the advertisers?

https://archive.ph/JhTuM


>Musk didn't want to buy Twitter.

He did but not for this price...


didn’t musk try to get out of buying twitter? because it cost too much for what it was?

> If Musk truly wanted to walk away, I think Twitter would find a way to let him.

They will let him walk away, but the starting number is $44B. Now they are just negotiating.


> Last year, Twitter’s interest expense was about $50 million. With the new debt taken on in the deal, that will now balloon to about $1 billion a year.

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/10/30/technology/elon-musk-twit...


Well, Elon Musk just sent Twitter employees an email saying it's worth about $20B. He paid $44B for it.

https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/1640049750966665218


> There's a reason Musk and his backers paid $ 44 billion for Twitter

Not really considering they desperately tried to get out of buying it.


Elon Musk himself in an article dated March 26, 2023.

Elon Musk Values Twitter at $20 Billion

The billionaire bought the social media company for $44 billion in October and took it private.

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/03/26/technology/elon-musk-twit...

I rounded up to 25 billion because it's been over a week. ;)


He's owned Twitter for a few days. He threw out $20 and then adjusted it down to $8, seemingly based on feedback. Did he already know that $8 was the appropriate amount? Was there already some internal analysis done that he is just piggy-backing on? It certainly seems like Musk is making big changes literally moments after arriving on scene.

I certainly expect him to pay the 1 billion dollars required for backing out, but of course he will try to avoid that.

The real reason is that he can't afford to buy Twitter at the negotiated price, which is entirely on Musk.


Where have you been? I think you may be uninformed on this.

Here's some details: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/04/26/technology/twitter-musk-b.... Later when Elon sought to pull out of the deal, Twitter threatened to go to court to enforce that $1B fee, which led to the buyout proceeding.


Wait, what debt has Musk made Twitter take on? (being at the helm mere days, I really doubt there's any, debt like that takes longer to raise)

Musk himself took on ~$12 billion to finance the deal, that debt isn't on Twitter's books.

next

Legal | privacy