Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

He didn't buy a majority stake, he bought the entire company.


sort by: page size:

Who are the other shareholders? I thought the entire point of the purchase is that he bought out all the shareholders.

So he didn’t increase the value of the company that much, he just increased his stake. Right?

He bought most shares of a company and took it private while not buying the Saudi's share

But he personally has a controlling stake in the company, it’s like at least half his money in some sense.

He has the controlling stake in the company.

He surely owns his stock outright, not as options, since he founded the company.

So he buys one share?

Why? He was also the majority shareholder.

That doesn't mean he sold his shares.

he sold 80% of his stock IIRC.

He doesn't. He only owns 20% or so of the company.

He leveraged his own personal stock, not the company.

He's a minority shareholder.

That's silly. For one thing, he says he's still the majority shareholder.

He didn't completely sell out. He still has the controlling stake in the company.

Not a majority shareholder, majority would be 50%+. He holds around 20% if I recall correctly. It's still a large portion, but it was outlined specifically in the article that he was not included in this investigation and didn't influence it.

He put the shares in when it was still a private company.

He's Executive Chairman now, and he still owns about 10% of it.

He owned 13.9% of the shares post-IPO. That's equivalent to about $104B at today's prices.
next

Legal | privacy