Timing of his arrest is a bit suspicious. Tomorrow SBF is supposed to testify before Congress [0] and his arrest by Bahamian authorities is a perfect way to make sure that the testimony will not happen. Coincidence...?
So I'm confused. The front-page article on HN is about why SBF isn't arrested yet. So shouldn't we already have a well-thought out suspicion of what he might be guilty of?
Basically, do we think this is just another financial bet gone sour (not illegal in itself)? Or do we think SBF stole something, lied about something, etc?
There's also the possibility that the state doesn't really want to stop SBF from incriminating himself, he seems to have been doing a pretty good job so far.
How many of these headlines do we have to read (representing multiple orders of magnitude LESS funds stolen compared to SBF) before SBF is in handcuffs?
reply