Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

Isn't that the point? It is their circle. Why would anybody decides of someones else's circle?


sort by: page size:

Not everyone has a circle. Some people are just points. Even though it feels pointless.

I am in that circle, so what?

Couldn’t you have the same person in multiple circles?

that's what circles are for.

>We don't give a damn about placing people in Circles

"We"? Who the hell is this "we"? I love the functionality of circles.


What's the circle about?

What circle?

The problem is you shared the circle to people who already had that circle (or part of it).

It is in some circles.

Can't figure out what the purpose of the circle is.

I do see how "circles" could be confusing, but isn't it also true that the circles we define may not be reciprocal or symmetrical in others' eyes? For example, I may consider someone an acquaintance but they may consider me a friend. Or I may consider someone as belonging to a book club circle but they may consider me as an acquaintance. To go to an extreme, a relative may consider me related but I may have had issues with that person and don't consider that person a relative (and just as a stranger, or an acquaintance).

I always understood the point of "circles" as how we privately define our personal world and our relationships with others, which may not necessarily be how those people view us. In comparison, I see Facebook's "lists" model less intuitive for people to understand and use.


This seems circular to me.

I think Circles makes more sense. How you see others is not necessarily how they see you.

Yes. He has a point with the circle though.

What circles?

This is essentially the point of the book The Circle.

This strikes me as circular.

> only in certain circles

The circles that matter :-)


It is a circle, from a certain point of view.
next

Legal | privacy