Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

No, of course he does not and this comment is against the guidelines of HN.


sort by: page size:

No, its just that kind of comment doesn't really belong on HN.

This comment doesn't really align with the HN guidelines.

Yes I read the article and your comment violates the HN guidelines.

How exactly? Care to explain how my comment violates the HN guidelines?

I don't really think that comment presents any risk to HN.

Technically, your comment is also against the HN guidelines. And so is mine (the very one you're reading right now). I think none of us are adding anything to the discussion.

The comment is not consistent with the guidelines for "Show HN".

Just pointing that his little ad hominem attack has no place on HN.

No. And this doesn't add anything constructive to the discussion. Please review the HN commenting guidelines (link is at the bottom of this page).

This person does not represent HN. They can have their opinion.

This comment has so little to do with the actual article we're discussing that it stands as evidence for why HN can't discuss articles like this.

Hmm. Maybe comments like this are why the author doesn't like HN.

"No"? Why is this being upvoted? I'd like to hear his reasons. "No" is not enough to spark the kind of meaningful discussion I've come to expect from HN.

What that comment said is true though. Does HN not value the truth?

Pure ad hominem. This comment has no place on HN.

Yeah, the quoted line clearly breaks the HN guidelines.

Such comments are against the ethos of HN and its guidelines, which you can find at the bottom of this page.

Comments misinterpreting the article are not relevant to HN as well

That's a wild implication you're making there based off of a person's comments. And is likely against HN rules.
next

Legal | privacy