Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

His car is not his jet.

Maybe he should stop phoning home



sort by: page size:

This reminds me of "emails won't send beyond 200 miles".

If his garage is angled, he could try neutralling out to the street before starting the car.


> His car malfunctioned. It wasn't careless driving.

Huh?


No, he doesn't. The car doesn't let you do this either.

Something is wrong with his thinking if he is using Subaru as a taxi. Look at the reliability ratings.

No, I hear you that he should've put out the triangle 100m behind the car, but you turned that comment into an attack on his character. No fair.

how can he know that guy do not have car with new function?

"The operator of a vehicle is responsible for operating it."

But he wasn't operating it.


He's parked in the wrong bay for that charger

Did he drive himself? Maybe the company should ask him to stop thinking and focus on driving.

The problem is not with the car but with the driver!

-- Enzo Ferrari

[Closed. Will not fix.]


It was a different jet, they went to court, and lost, because it was unreasoble. Cars are given away all the time, so this is not unreasonable.

There's no indication that the guy was aware he put it in Summon mode. He double tapped something he was trying to single tap and then didn't respond to a modal popup as he was exiting the vehicle.

This is not a UI interaction that should result in the car driving off by itself. Humans are fallible.


Perhaps your reactionary pearl clutching is severely misplaced. The author didn’t say he drove it anywhere busy or that he really drove it much at all.

I can’t help but judge you harshly for actually thinking the author is careening down a street at any speed with the windows up “light headed on fumes”.


I agree. He's willing to lie about how long he was at the Milford supercharger station by reporting 58 minutes while in reality it was 47 minutes. He's intentionally reducing range whilst reporting otherwise so it can't be a matter of time savings. He's trying to vandalize the reputation of the vehicle.

It doesn't need to phone home when the ignition is off and could have been programmed to go into standby. You can hardly crash a car with the ignition off. Even if you do, it could be woken up using an accelerometer and try to phone home just a a few times. This is shitty engineering. I am quite amazed, because the Japanese normally don't do this. Probably another stupid marketing decision.

What are the rules to this "technically correct"?

It's not even flying the car!


"He said his wife had not activated any self-driving features at the time of the crash."

He said it himself, the electronics were off, his wive fucked up.


What I find difficult to believe is that he set out on the journey with a 2CV. Of course he broke it. It's a good car, but it's not a jeep.

In fact, after trying numerous approaches and trying to work through the car’s software controls, Deeter found himself driving to a board meeting with one hand on the steering wheel and one holding shut the driver-side door. “It wasn’t terribly smart, but I didn’t have time to call an Uber.”

Don't do things like this.

next

Legal | privacy