Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

On recheck the 2020 page did contain the pics in question, for some reason they didn't load.

Still this isn't a case of they posted links to materials. Anyone that wants to find them needs to invest some effort to actually find them.



sort by: page size:

The archive link doesn't appear to include the images, which are perhaps the most interesting part of the whole page IMO.

Unfortunate that the pictures aren't there.

So where are the pictures?

So where are the photos, like Gawker had on their front page?

All I see is a report that it exists. Neither of the two links in the tweet were to stories showing the photos.


i don't see any pictures in the link.

Really, no one has provided a link to any credible images?

You should reread the comment you're replying to.

> Most noticeably, what is almost always missing are descriptions of the images, links to where they're located on the site


There are no such images in the article now.

Didn't you click the article to see that it has images from them?

Wait so where are the photos?

Currently marked "unpublished" and missing supporting images.

Unfortunately, the images didn't load when I was reading your article, so I didn't see them :(. Glad to hear you're already aware of these, though.

The more detailed stories in the link do not mention that the material was forwarded unreviewed. In fact, they specifically mention that this concerns 16 images.

Where are the pictures?

The claim to have photos. They did not seem to have shared them :/

Looking in that thread, it seems no pictures were ever posted (or if they were, they are there no longer).

So where are pictures?

Or the pages that give tantalising hints about a project, but there doesn't seem to be a write-up anywhere.

https://www.flickr.com/photos/fotoopa_hs/sets/72157611107153...

https://www.flickr.com/photos/fotoopa_hs/4082464167/in/album...


Where are the pictures? Seeing is believing.
next

Legal | privacy