Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

Quite the opposite. You can't fake revenue nearly as much as you can fake profits. Examples are legion - look at any company in the US that pays 0% (or negative) corporate tax rate.


sort by: page size:

Um are you legally allowed to say that you’re making revenue, but choosing not to be profitable? It seems like fraud.

Yeah, but revenue figures are much harder to manipulate than "profits"...

You can only fake it to a certain extent since you report cash flow. Even for cash flow from operating activities Google (35%), Apple (30%), and Facebook (52%!) outshone Comcast (25%).

Bwaha, revenue can be massaged even worse. There are companies making BILLIONS in revenue, and it all sounds very impressive until you see they are actually burning more money than they are even making. Profit can’t be more than revenue, but it can certainly be negative.

Revenue, not profit. Revenue cannot be negative.

Absolutely, but that's not negative revenue.

Revenue, not profit.

Revenue is not the same as profit.

Revenue is quite different from profit.

Inflated revenues would be the thing to look for, not inflated profits.

Revenue is not profit.

revenue is not profit.

Revenue is not profit.

Revenue is not profit.

Yup. Unlike revenue, profits can turn negative, in which case % changes become nonsensical.

that's revenue, not profit.

Profit, not revenue.

revenue is not profit

Revenue is not profit
next

Legal | privacy