Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

They've needed a new CEO since Sundar became CEO.


sort by: page size:

I agree with this. All investors may see is a panicking company and a leader who can't inspire or control. Get rid of Sundar. He's a peacetime CEO or a COO.

Sundar became CEO in 2015. The author quit this year. Was his "lack of visionary leadership" not that obvious for 8+ years? Or did the author stay because the stock price and his TC kept going up?

Sundar has been hired by the voting share owners, Larry and Sergey to run their company. This is 100% their fault for being uninterested in the company they control.

Their current CEO wanted out of that role, so they have been looking for a new CEO.

Because, despite what the HN hiveminds think, the company has been performing extremely well under Sundar.

Unless he starts destroying Larry and Sergey's wealth he will remain as CEO.


Seems to me like the CEO is underperforming, shouldn't the company look for a new CEO like any company of this size?

^ this is correct.

As owners, they can provide cover for management to put more discretionary funding into combating this threat.

I think Sundar has yet to prove himself as a great CEO, but this is good leadership.


Sundar was chosen following a series of failures by megalomaniacal executives Larry had appointed/approved to head various departments, including Andy Rubin, Tony Fadell, and Anthony Levandwoski. Sundar was a move in the opposite direction.

They already replaced their last CEO due to outrage. Another replacement would signal disaster.

I read the opposite just a few hours ago... They need to switch CEO

Sundar Pichai is CEO, not Schmidt. Although he is still Chairman.

They would probably need to get a new CEO...

They also replaced their CEO with NeXT's

My suspicion here is simple; they couldn't find a proper candidate who can demonstrates technological and operational leadership from both insiders and outsiders. You can simply promote either of them (usually COO suits better though), but that risks departure of another candidate, so this compromise has to be made. Anyway, this might be okay for Waymo for a short term; unlike other companies, even if those two CEO don't agree on a specific matter, there's an escalation path to Sundar (and ultimately Larry and Sergey).

Is there one to replace its CEO?

The current one's only been CEO for four years; the structural problems presumably are older. Like, they probably _should_ consider losing the CEO, but that in itself is not going to fix anything.

Sundar never "took over" in anything but a job title sense. Larry and Sergey continue to hold supermajority voting power over the company's board. The business operates the way Larry and Sergey want it to.

I think people want an excuse to justify their previous positive outlooks on Larry and Sergey by claiming something has changed. But Larry and Sergey still sit in charge of an extremely harmful company under investigation for numerous types of illegal and inappropriate conduct. Both had inappropriate relationships with subordinates that should've gotten them both fired, and both of them have yachts and/or islands that are worth more than some small countries.


But there's the new CEO. Only the CEO can improve the overall management of the company

Their new CEO is an unmitigated disaster. Either he will have to change his ways or he will be leaving very very soon.
next

Legal | privacy