Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

There are many forks for that, not a problem.


sort by: page size:

But forks prevent that, right?

Forking works fine.

Also, there may very well be forks already that are used by many people that allow to do what they want.

There have been multiple forks.

There are well maintained forks.

Forking is hardly easier

I don't see what would prevent folks from switching to a fork if that happened.

What is wrong with having many forks? Just ignore the ones you don't care about.

Wonder how they would deal with forks, if it's an issue at all.

Yes, the more forks the merrier. Just make sure the good ones filter to the top somehow.

Absolutely not. Forks are extremely important. Where did you come up with that idea?

fork(2) will do though.

There are now several forks with different features.

Yup, and forks don't have to be permanent.

Imo be ready to fork all the things if need be. Get comfortable with it before you're forced to.


It works, I assume there would be forks if needed.

There's like two or three forks out there. I'm not sure how active any of them are though.

The fork could maintain these.

With 1.5k forks I'm not exactly worried. But thank you for pressing a button.

Which fork?
next

Legal | privacy