Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

Idk about the tax but this probably a relatively easy raise, it's only not debt because they don't want to carry that into potential IPO?


sort by: page size:

You need to add back income taxes of about $80M, so they are only $120M short. Interest expense is pre-tax.

Clarification: the debt portion of “up to $1B” is from Sherpa Capital. An unannounced but probably much smaller amount of equity was raised from BMW and others.

The $500 could be senior to the rest of the capital structure and accruing maybe.

This is new debt not stock. These are bonds @5.3% which is close to the rate SolarCity was raising money.

In the UK company directors can borrow money from their companies, but if it isn't repaid after a certain duration a tax of 32.5% becomes due.

The public record[0] tells the story

      Year end April 2017:
        - Number of employees     : 6
        - Directors Loan          : £238K 
        - Balance sheet           : £154K
        - Tax due                 : £60K

      Year end April 2018:
        - Number of employees     : 8
        - Directors Loan          : £999K (prev rolled over)
        - Balance sheet           : £736K
        - Tax due                 : £303K

      Year end April 2019:
        - Number of employees     : 2
        - Directors Loan          : £1.27M (prev rolled over)
        - Balance sheet           : £1.1M
        - Tax due                 : £307K

      Year end May 2020:
        - Number of employees     : 1
        - Directors Loan          : £253K (£1.1M has been repaid)
        - Balance sheet           : £227K
        - Tax due                 : £15K
Repaying the loan would have allowed for the 32.5% tax owed by the company to be reclaimed, then regular corporation tax of 19% and personal dividend/income taxes would have been paid.

My theory is that his directors loans were fully invested in personal assets (or spent), which explains why the tax wasn't ultimately paid in 2018/19. So he nerfed the company so his tax bill could paid from revenue earned between mid 2018 and early 2020. This fits with the fact that he only started rehiring seriously in 2020.

Customers effectively paid for unmaintained open source software during this time. Now of course, on the website, he brags about how much he loves customers.

I can't speak for the IoM move specifically. I know the CEO has familial connections there, but I'm sure the confluence of tax advantages helps.

[0] https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/c...


I'd expect them to be able to finance paying the taxes with an equity collateralised loan. If not the entire tax bill, at least a big chunk of it.

The $750M is the amount of convertible debt; there's a separate $250M of new common stock being issued.

This is debt and equity. At least $4m equity, I suspect most of it is debt.

Unless I'm mistaken, this is just saying that the fund purchased B&N with cash. That doesn't mean they haven't taken on debt to do so.

Perhaps their assets are north of $100m and this debt is senior to all equity.

they have healthy balance sheet pay this off. But most likely, they will take on long term debt to finance this.

They made $37bn revenue and $684m profit (presumably post-debt-payments) last year, so I don't think that line of credit will be terribly challenging for them to repay.

Not really. It looks like they are carrying a considerably amount of debt (half a billion). They list their assets at some $100 million below that.

I'd be surprised if a lot of the core patents/IP hasn't already been sold off.


It's a complete mystery to me why they don't raise some capital at this valuation. They could wipe off all the debt and have a decade's worth of capex in cash for a very small dilution.

I can't believe it would be that low, unless they were in some trouble, lots of debts. But they are a software house, so that should not happen.


They have $350 million in debt alone. $1B+ seems entirely reasonable for the whole company.

I am sure they are tranching the debt and selling the senior tranche as investment grade.
next

Legal | privacy