Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

"I've warned my publishers that if they later on so much as change a single comma in one of my books, they will never see another word from me. Never! Ever!

...

When I am gone, if that happens, then I’ll wish mighty Thor knocks very hard on their heads with his Mjolnir. Or I will send along the 'enormous crocodile' to gobble them up."

-- Roald Dahl, 1982



sort by: page size:

> I got fired over an argument about comma placement.

hopefully not for wanting to use an Oxford comma!


> We live in a world, where

The comma should not be used there.


> I'd never (not so far) encounter a word or text that starts with a comma immediately followed by anything.

Agreed. I prefer using `!bang`s for the same reason for expanding text.


I have had a similar experience but I don't blame the internet. I blame my age and a growth of my own critical thinking. It used to be that anything an authority told me was "great writing" was great writing. This of course included a wide array of 18th and 19th century writing. But as I've read more I've come to the conclusion that while writing of that era is full of many woderful plots, observations, philosophies, etc, it mostly is not great writing. And a good portion of the ideas illuminated in that writing have been better presented in later writing. So I have a develop an extreme intolerance for 1) naval gazing in writing and 2) complexity. Your thoughts can be complex. Your use of the comma however should not be.

This is not an intolerance for complex ideas or difficult subjects. It is the same reaction I have to a set of bad instructions. That is to thrust them away and try for myself or find another source.

Edit: A little more succinctly, I trust authors less. I have less faith that because you've published a book you have something worth saying. I believe less that wrangling with your abstruse language will yield a reward worth struggling for. So when I encounter difficulty, I discard the coconut and seek an orange.


Missing a comma I think: "Don't, be evil."

The Oxford comma is opposed by the NYT editors, Hitler and Stalin.

Not to mention commas.

> It's really hard to find fiction books, that are less than 500 pages.

To play editor for a moment — your sentence needs no comma, and it’s easy to find fiction books with fewer than 500 pages ;)

Was a clause omitted?


Thanks for the clarification. Commas and quotes, the bane of my existence, glad to see I'm not alone :)

> For a recent project, I read

Fixed that for you.

Usually commas aren't important, but that specific sentence really suffers in readability without it.


To paraphrase one of my favorite quotes (from the guy who developed Comic Sans):

If you really love the Oxford Comma you don't know much about writing and need a new hobby. If you really hate the Oxford Comma you don't know much about writing and need a new hobby.


Commas are relevant. Even in the English language.

What no one realized is that there was a comma missing.

It wasn't: don't do evil, it was: don't, do evil.


> punctuation, especially placement of commas

If it's any consolation, in my experience, no two native English speakers can agree on where and how often commas are needed either.


Or just don't put in a comma.

As a freelance writer, this is sort of cool to me.

"The pen is mightier than the sword" and all that. A little comma -- or lack thereof -- moves millions of dollars in one direction or the other.

Food for thought.


> English punctuation does not significantly alter meaning in my opinion

Let's eat, Grandma! vs Let's eat Grandma!

Commas save lives.


> No don't use comma in the header names

You just know that someone somewhere will do just that and you'll have to deal with it as best you can.


> it's a line like any other

yeah, in other words - there should be no commas whatsoever. Weren't you the one complaining about redundancy?

next

Legal | privacy