Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

>Those contracts are with a company that doesn’t exist anymore

the company existed when the payment was made though, so why would your comment anything at the time of the payouts?



sort by: page size:

> I've allowed some of my debts to go unpaid because I considered repayment to be a poor deal.

Could you elaborate on this? I don't know if it's what you intended but it just comes off like you defrauded a company.


> everyone doing business with these guys now knows they don't pay

No. I know that there is a payment dispute involving these guys. I also know that one party to that dispute acted in an unprofessional, possibly defamatory, manner.


> I seriously doubt paying them off even could work. Why would they not take the payment then do it anyway?

Because then they wouldn't get paid more later.


> You took a bet relying on a third party business, and that bet didn't pay off.

Actually it paid off for more than 15 years, which makes the whole complaining even more unjustified.


> I felt a bit guilty making so much money off the situation

Not really sure why people feel guilty when a corporation negotiates a mutually beneficial agreement with them.


>so they sent my account to a collections agency

Important clarification: they sold your account to a collections agency. They made more than what you actually owed them by doing that, which is probably why they did that.


> The only time I got paid per interaction with a customer it was called commission.

Sounds like you were being taken advantage of. That's without knowing the details of the situation though. :(


Quote:

"[Levandowski] agreed to plead guilty to trade-secret theft and was driven into bankruptcy when Google won a contract-breach arbitration case against him -- he was counting on Uber’s promise when it first hired him to provide legal cover, known as indemnification, from his former employer.

Uber now says it has no obligation to reimburse Levandowski for the $180 million."


>If the final price was $215k it certainly seems possible to pay off most of $120k with that.

Right. I was "implying" that perhaps the business wasn't as good a business as I thought.


> I will also like to be compensated for what has been a frustrating waste of time

They shut down over a year ago. IANAL but you've lost your money, and the notion you'd get compensated for not handling your own affairs in a timely manner is ludicrous.


> Where do you get off reneging contracts and fleecing people of their money based solely on longitude and latitude and TLD?

They’re terminating their contract, not reneging.


> I am not going to make an international payment to some random company that I have no idea about.

Why not? You do have an idea about them: TeamViewer asked you to pay them.

> I suspect they want me to do this because closing internally with the company will mean admitting to the agency that they sold a bad debt.

Maybe. Maybe that's just how it's easier for them.


>EDIT: You can only be a contractor if they are actually paying you. If you are getting no money, not sure what that means.

Breach of contract?


>...they booked a $5m loss and made a policy to never trade with that particular bank again

Maybe I am too cynical, but would many businesses retroactively agree to a deal which would cost them a ton of money? If the Process requires Is dotted, Ts crossed, and a phone call confirmation which was never placed -why eat the loss when the other party should own the error?

Citi just had a lawsuit because of paying back a loan too quickly. I expect everyone in finance to play hard ball on written agreements when it works in their favor.


> I have been paying and being paid for decades now, and I have never involved a payment processor in a dispute I had with the other side.

Have you considered that the possibility of disputes and the existence of a framework for resolving them is part of the reason for that?


>I’m curious how you’re certain they defaulted.

I'm sorry that was sarcasm. I didn't make any assumptions I just clicked the box or button or whatever.


> Is the author suggesting screwing over the companies you buy services from by not paying them?

Some companies play this game all the time - I’ve even heard it referred to as “supplier stretch”.

They pay eventually, but late to improve cash flow. The flip side is when they come to renegotiate their contract, you take late payment into account in the new offer, and they have hurt the relationship, so it’s not a particularly long term strategy (and once you have started, it can be hard to pull back to a position where you aren’t late for everything depending on cash flow).


> that their payment system broke down earlier this year and booking.com still has not paid them hundreds / thousands they are owed.

"Aw, shucks, the payment system is still broke. Just be a few months before the repair company can be by to fix it. Nothing to worry about here. No need to contact a lawyer or the AG's office." ?


> If I minted an NFT that said for every period you paid you could collect royalties from my art then you would have a valid contractual claim after purchasing it, even if I didn't make the deal with you initially.

I don't believe this statement to be accurate.

next

Legal | privacy