Are you talking about Bing Chat, which cites actual web pages it used to make the summary, or ChatGPT, which is a very different beast and relies on built-in knowledge rather than searches?
You seem to be talking about chatgpt, not bing chat. Bing chat literally uses the search engine queries and links to those sources. I have seen its summaries include mistakes, but I have never seen it invent sources (I’ve tried maybe 500 chat queries).
It’s ironic that you’re very confidently presenting erroneous information here. I’d really recommend trying the actual product, or at least looking at the demos. It has some problems. It does not have the same problems that chatgpt does, because it does not rely solely on LLM baked-in data.
Thats definitely the difference between chatgpt and bing's model. Chatgpt was trained mostly on articles and blog posts where bing was trained on personal messages and it shows.
There are two versions here, Bing Chat(GPT) via bing.com, and OpenAI's ChatGPT w/ Bing via chat.openai.com. You're referring to the former, I'm using the latter.
Bing has to be slower since it mixes in context from the web. So technically it does a Web search, feeds the results into ChatGPT, while ChatGPT itself doesn't have this step.
At least in my experience, ChatGPT uses Bing a whole lot. I wonder what the stats for Bing usage are now compared to Google since ChatGPT has been out for a while.
reply