I didn't called out the above user. I was merely replying to him. Furthermore, I've addressed the merits of his objection. In fact, you have not addressed the merits of what I said, and neither did the other user.
My comments have been insightful. Your frustration is just refusal to engage with the facts.
But let me re-iterate: JeanHeyd's supposed "work" is contingent to his explosive temperament, and petty personality. He considers criticism to his work as obstruction, or outright bigotry. He is also very skilled in going full scorched earth on others, and shows no sense of restraint in those occasions, which leads to immense distress to anyone singled out as the object of his rage.
>many of us will laugh at you as well
For the record, I will welcome being laughed at in public, if I were to act that foolishly under the public eye.
The post he was responding too wasn't any kind of civil or even logical discussion. It just said his examples and analysis were borderline garbage with no justification.
I believe the author, who is self-important, is calling me a dilettante (clearly he would say that, he's a writer). He's wrong. He thinks people shouldn't argue. His main point seems to be that people will be happier if they agree with him, but I'm enjoying this post anyway. And he said, "people are getting angrier". Jerk.
reply