Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

Argumentum ad nauseam.


sort by: page size:

“Ad nauseam” but we should never be bored by these arguments.

argumentum ad populum much?

argumentum ab auctoritate

argumentum ad novitam

argumentum ad logicam. And around and around we go.

argument

"Argumentum ad generics"

Is there a properly recognized name for "argumentum ad anecdotum?"

"Appeal to emotion or argumentum ad passiones is a logical fallacy characterized by the manipulation of the recipient's emotions in order to win an argument, especially in the absence of factual evidence."

That you don't want to see it doesn't mean there is not factual evidence. Do you want evidence? Start caring about looking for it. You can start here [1].

[1] H.O.P.E. documentary: https://youtu.be/pDg7tlEJD64


>for the sake of argument

Oh. Argumentum ad baby steps.

;)


Arguments?

Arguments ?

He saw OP's argumentum ad verecundiam and raised it.

Argumentum ad populum. Are you really going to generalize as well?

Well, I'd caution you not to make argumentum ad populum an organizing principle in your life. I've seen it attempted many times and rarely if ever does it result in increased happiness.

This quote doesn't make it any more right. Argumentum Quotumdumb or Quotis Profundis is a valid debate technique, it but isn't a valid cognitive one.

"In argumentation theory, an argumentum ad populum (Latin for "appeal to the people") is a fallacious argument which is based on claiming a truth or affirming something is good because the majority thinks so."

Isn't that the central conceit of democracy?


> this "what if?" argument is thrown up too often as an emotional argument

The reason it is thrown up is because it does happen.

next

Legal | privacy