Ok, thanks for your contribution.
reply
Duly noted.
Thanks!
>I'm going to bow out. Cheers.
Thanks for acknowledging it, then.
I'm fairly sure that I do not agree with you.
No, you're not.
You disagree that they enjoyed the article?
They do support the general point - if you think otherwise, please articulate how they do not.
My apologies. Just did that - I'm habitually a post-then-improve type of commenter.
No... what? Not sure what you're disagreeing with.
That seems a bit sarcastic ... ;)
no.
Thanks for agreeing with the parts you didn't mention tho.
The ones you mentioned, we can disagree on them, if only because nothing useful is gonna come from further discussion of them here.
Not at all. But it doesn't matter if I agree or not - I was just making an observation.
Um, your response is not agreement.
Opinions and claims are not mutually exclusive.
> That's yours.
Yup, thanks.
But everything you wrote is full agreement.
It doesn't, sorry for suggesting that.
As long as your statement is presented as an opinion, I'm fine with that.
No, I totally disagree with you and just pointed out the most obvious weakness in your argument.
Respectfully disagree.
Ok, thanks for your contribution.
reply