Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

They also cite themselves within that citation. That second citation contains a citation also written by them. Citationception!


sort by: page size:

wait, did you just cite yourself?

It's called a citation.

I cite myself.

In this instance, it would know because of the citations.

The citation is the article itself.

I completely agree with this. Sometimes you have to look closer than people often do to spot self-citation.

Cite them then.

Does that count to cite oneself? Doesn't pass my veracity check.

At the level where you cite the work of others.

You've been provided two opportunities to cite those articles.

I can see them citing themselves once or twice but not 10's of times or more.

Genuine question lost in the blizzard on this thread... but why would a citation add to this? It would just indicate that someone else agreed; what does this add?

The first two-thirds of that sentence was the "citation" for the final third.

> Sometimes it's just an attempt to do the due diligence of citing the primary reference rather than the reference that cited the reference that cited the primary reference.

True, but in this case you should include both references.


Must be another one of those pesky self-citing researchers.

I similarly chuckle in cases where there's a citation covering the whole sentence but someone felt the need to slap a "citation needed" on a specific clause despite that clause being supported in the existing citation.

> This is often the case outside of Wikipedia as well.

Often they just read the wikipedia article that cited the paper.


Are they cited in that manner? (I don’t know either way, just curious)

Is this on Citation Statement search? I think it is probably because the citation context contains two or more citations in it. We look at citations per sentence so it is duplicated there. I can see how that is confusing though.
next

Legal | privacy