Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

No, that wouldn't make any sense. I would count them as anarchists.


sort by: page size:

If they are organized they are not Anarchists, right? That's the point.

This article keeps describing anarchists and then following up with 'but they're not anarchists'.

You keep using that word, I do not think it means what you think it means.


So, they were anarchists?

Almost all anarchists around the world would not consider those people anarchists. Anarchism is anti-capitalist. Please see the history https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchism

Anarchists.

They are not anarchists, just leftists.

This is not what the modern definition of "Anarchists" means at all.

I think you don't understand the meaning of 'anarchist'

They are radical anarchists. If you're going to try to split this along ideological lines, at least get the ideologies right.

They seem to be anarchist in a sense that they reject the notion of state as an organizational structure for their society.

An anarchist, then?

Maybe you're asking anarchists ;)

Yes, specially Anarchists.

Yes. But only if you think anarchist == anarchy. In reality, anarchist == anarchism, which is a collectivist/socialist philosophy masquerading as anarchy.

A state based on anarchy is an oxymoron.


The people you're talking about are "anarchists".

Probably some kind of anarchist group.

neither is "anarchists" to anarchists. Not sure what's the point OP is making

I don't think even a significant fraction of the people over at http://openborders.info would describe themselves as anarchists...

Sorry, I forgot the anarchists ;)
next

Legal | privacy