You _are_ misunderstanding. They banked at SVB betting on higher returns than other safer options and lost that bet. They were only ever told they would get 250k of that bet back. Now they are whining about it.
They accepted the risk of losing $100m because they thought there was a significant chance of getting a much bigger return. Obviously in this case the bet didn't pay off, but putting 0.05% of the AUM in a high risk investment is hardly a scandal.
The real issue is that one made a bet on a future that didnt come true. The opposite could easily have happened too. Oil prices could have hit $1k a barrel and people in the suburbs would be crying about the $500 fill up.
reply