Headlines are too short to inform. There's almost always context and nuance that's just as important as whatever the headline is about. Even the full article often fails to go in enough depth on this, and it's pretty much impossible to summarize that in the headline unless you make it a "headparagraph".
A lot of authors need to realize that the headline is the most important part of their article's content and not some extraneous bit information they can simply distance themselves from.
If a headline could convey everything in an article why write the whole article? There's always more than could possibly fit in a headline; "yes, buts", etc.
Just because the title is technically accurate, doesn't mean it's useful. An ideal headline should accurately and succinctly communicate the contents of the page it links to.
The purpose of a headline is to attract the reader's attention so yours is not better. But you already proved that yourself by clicking on on title and reading the article.
reply