Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

I can confirm that this works as a bypass for IBM's MaaS360 for at least one organization


sort by: page size:

Heh it works for IBM

Yes, except this is private to IBM employees. Helpful when you're in an industry with a lot of regulatory / compliance oversight.

IBM does something similar as well.

works fine for IBM

I noticed IBM does this too.

IBM has their own implementations.

Do you work for IBM, by any chance?

IBM used this kinda of contractor quite a lot in the 2000s and a bit later; I don't know if it does anymore.

Oh yes. Always been using IBM for that!

It's what my employer uses, they dont really have much choice because they're running on IBM hardware.

IBM has done this as well.

They don't need to, they're paying a third-party for support. I wouldn't be surprised if the contractor has an IBM support account.

IBM does.

Only if IBM knows Microsoft is using XYZ

I think this is a bad idea (people left IBM in the 70s for this) but I’d bet the pitch is something like enterprises reassigning equipment or trying to reduce the number of different things they purchase, where you’d only enable it on the servers where you need it. I’d be surprised if many customers found that effective, however, and I’m betting there’ll be at least one fun security exploit either bricking systems or figuring out how to get Intel to bill someone.

Nice try IBM

It might, but you'd have to argue against IBM's lawyers to prove it. They seem to have a reputation for effectiveness, so that might not go so well.

sadly that's standard IBM procedure, I wonder what their OpenUP process says about it.

I don't see any developer documentation at the link. IBM, for all its faults, has some amazingly specific documentation and examples that actually work.
next

Legal | privacy