Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

I don't see how they can find a better CEO.


sort by: page size:

I genuinely think they have the wrong ceo.

Seems to me like the CEO is underperforming, shouldn't the company look for a new CEO like any company of this size?

I’m amazed that they don’t have a new CEO already, or at least haven’t dramatically cut his pay.

They will have lots of problems trying to hire the next CEO then.

Is there one to replace its CEO?

I don't know why anyone would want to be the CEO of such a troubled company without either a huge golden parachute or a huge payoff in the event of an acquisition.

It's unbelievable that the CEO still has his job.

OK, but they will still need a CEO.

The current one's only been CEO for four years; the structural problems presumably are older. Like, they probably _should_ consider losing the CEO, but that in itself is not going to fix anything.

They already replaced their last CEO due to outrage. Another replacement would signal disaster.

unfortunately the ceo's only job is to increase share price and they can only do that with unlimited growth.

But there's the new CEO. Only the CEO can improve the overall management of the company

...as their CEO?

Yeah, why is that one of the biggest tech companies with fingers in many pies, turning billions a quarter in profits, can't find a new CEO in a couple of days? Anyone can run this kind of company, right? Right?

Only solution is taking away this ceo

The sad thing is that the CEO is still there.

Yeah, right. With this CEO? No way!

They'd probably be better off finding an executive who works for 100k/yr but believes in the company.

They would probably need to get a new CEO...
next

Legal | privacy