Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

I saw them as demos rather than finished products. Kinda like, "Look, you can chat tune these if you want to."


sort by: page size:

I think the intention was just to demo some aspects of material.

I feel like the fact that they are demos rather than products make them rather useless.

Why would you think that? Anything that shows off your skills has value. Well, it would to me anyway. I mean, if I were evaluating your candidacy for a job, I wouldn't care if your projects were demos or "actual products".


To be honest, their demo's seem confusing and don't feel "right" in an ux way.

agreed..although, that's a more appropriate thing to critique to developing a production-ready product than a demo like this.

Yeah, For demo of products.

Yes... but I'm not sure if it's due to misuse of tech demos, or the misunderstanding of what they are (maybe both?).

Tech demos are kind of like concept cars. They're a glimpse of what's possible, but not necessarily practical.


Once you know what goes into these demos, it's not really comparable.

I mean, these were cute and demos were a bit "wow" but the practicality seemed reduced, especially when most of the use cases they demonstrated would be covered by a phone call.

The big industrial use case I saw was to receive teleguidance to repair equipment, the ground reality is that most of the time if you don't know how to fix it... You're not allowed to try to fix it.


These things don't demo well precisely because a demo doesn't help anyone to understand the decisions made in developing them. You can not just say "prepare to demo them anyway", that doesn't do anything useful.

> Do a live demo, people love live demo's

I'm not sure if I agree with that, in my experience they seem to fail or underwhelm about 50% of the time.


He threw something together that people could get a feel for. I'll concede that it was hardly usable given the performance. But it was only a demo, enough of one to show just how usable the real thing could be.

Announced and demoed. Could be a severely lacking demonstration version but it still had to be presentable.

Why didn't you use a live demo?

Why would you demo a prototype?

I have developed a belief about this: people don't know what they want until you show them what they said they want. Then it's immediately obvious to them what they wanted instead.

This suggests that demos and mock-ups might be a valuable tool. The sooner you can get someone to try something, the sooner they can tell you what direction they really wanted you to go in instead, and the less time you waste.


Now that demos are out, it's rather disappointing.

I had to send the demo to people around the world, rather than demo it myself over a call.

Oh I've used some of the "less than ideal" things during demos before. It truly was an underserved need within the ecosystem.

Do you feel that way about demos?
next

Legal | privacy