Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

Uh yea, probably should be sent to the state attorney for that bullshit.


sort by: page size:

Have you contacted your state's attorney general? This sounds like exactly the sort of case that their office would be interested in pursuing.

This feels like a "contact your state attorney general and government representatives" type of situation.

Can anyone point to anything to support the state’s case here? It seems perverse and like they’re not even pretending to seek justice.

Probably a federal crime.

It is under oath. This is not the kind of thing that should be prosecuted. Jeez.

This is pretty messed up. I hope this gets tested in court.

This sounds like influence peddling I think a prosecutor needs to look into this.

The state authorities already dumped the complaint. What HE did was legal

This is a case for the state attorney general (or equivalent legal authority wherever this person lives).

This county employee should be arrested and charged with destroying evidence.

This is well into "criminal complaint" territory.

and ironically, this is definitely the sort of criminal act the DA would go after.

And possibly a felony charge for structuring.

My point exactly. This should be getting prosecuted under RICO.

You would hope that, if it's true that this business was compliant with letter and spirit of the State law, the California States Attorney would make a polite request to their Federal counterpart asking that the case be dropped as not in the public interest. If they don't, it seems like the State is hanging him out to dry.

That sounds so far from the realm of being in anyway necessary, and not just outright racketeering that you/your friend should contact local media, the DOJ or both.

So is this being treated as a civil matter? To me this seems more like the kind of thing the prosecutor's office should pursue.

should definitely be prosecuted IMO

God damnit can they just came it to General Attorneys or something I hate this one.
next

Legal | privacy