Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

“Useless eater” is a term I suppose I’m disappointed, but not surprised by, at this point.


sort by: page size:

What are useless eaters? You’ve put it in quotes, but I don’t see it elsewhere.

A convenient stance, I suppose, when discussing what to do with “useless eaters.”

What are you getting at? You are dangerously close to referring to human beings as “useless eaters.” [0]

—-

[0]: https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/useless_eater


Sorry I don't follow. Who is a useless eater? Who is advocating weeding them out?

My usual thought when people complain about useless eaters is useless to who? Sure they don't think my 85 year old dad is important. But if I have to chose between between them and my dad, dad wins.

Another observation is prosocial 'useless eaters' live quiet lives and don't consume much. And a lot of them mostly pull their own weight. More, lot of super dupers seem mostly good at socially engineering a bigger share than they entitled to. If we're talking my special needs brother vs some tech bro working on spyware and adtech the choice for me isn't close as with my dad.

See: Developmentally Disabled Burger King Employee Only Competent Worker


Indeed, no tasty food doesn’t imply no good (e.g. relatively nutritious) food.

Agreed, it’s like describing an eating meal as “ingesting calories”. It’s an impoverished viewpoint.

I am also amused that this trait is going to die out.

The trait of changing dietary preferences based on flawed understanding of how organisms suffer and which ones.


It's a bit rude to say there is zero appetite for something in reply to a person who just expressed an appetite for it.

You're just a boring omnivore, like most of us.

sure they'll require sustenence but i highly doubt that our definition of food will apply

I'll agree that it's dumb but, unfortunately, it is sometimes necessary if one wants to eat.

Nice article about an awful product. I don't eat to live: I live to eat.

The food/diet component of their existence is really the absolute least of their problems.

Nobody wants to really take responsibility of humans being able to eat.

It’s a convenient intellectual term for us, but if you ask the guy who is starving then he would likely disagree with you.

You seem like the type of person who just eats food for energy and survival.

Completely agreed. A lot of commenters on HN are completely missing the social function of eating.

I guess "significance" is in the eye of the beholder, but skipping a snack seems significant to me.
next

Legal | privacy