Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

They erect a grounded mast to provide lightning protection for each parked plane. (Source: discussed purpose of said mast with ground crew at Nellis last year).


sort by: page size:

This appears to be just moving the aircraft for parking.

So dumb questions:

Why were they shorting out the tower? (What was the purpose of the cable)

What are those rubber things?

What would happen to a bird that landed on the tower (not grounded)

What about a large metal helicopter (if it didn't crash)?


The pilots "see" it with sensors.

The tower sees it with a set of binoculars. Hopefully.


I believe it's a helium-filled cable-stayed aerostat that's used to surveil air traffic. There was once a similar one over in St. Mary Parish.

Thanks for that, I was wondering if the grounds portion of the ils was hit, or the plane component.

How do they make sure they don’t blind aircraft?

Useful info, thanks. So it's more of slo-mo crash landing then - that makes much more sense now. And the bit about the directional antenna also makes total sense.

Seems like a significant security risk that it is publicly trackable?

I've seen AF1 land at the airport here (Bozeman) -- it flew in to the area at high altitude then circled tightly reducing altitude until final approach. I assumed to reduce the chance of a stinger hit from mountain-men.


I find the 'hero' photo fascinating, of the aircraft lined up quite closely under construction. The closeness, the apparent temporary nature of the equipment nearby, the lack of there being a 'line'. Then it struck me perhaps the planes are stationary, while the 'line' moves around them. Can anyone shed any light?

I interpreted it as training flights for readiness preparation. Plus, drones sorties were (are?) flown remotely out of Nellis.

It is not uncommon to be driving between Las Vegas and Phoenix and have jets from Luke AFB flying training missions overhead at low altitude.

A lot of helicopter training is done out here as well.


My guess is there is something in right traffic that they aren't allowed to fly over, or there is terrain/tall buildings potentially making it dangerous in inclement weather

You can see some ground from the cockpit.

I really wonder how visible the Dash-8 was on the runway? After all, it has strobes, beacon, and the A350 has landing lights.

Or there's too much other flashing lights around the runway? Or the pilots were busy monitoring the displays?


Looks like San Francisco, so I assume it's an exercise and perhaps they're all tracking the same friendly plane.

Surprised there are not cameras recording what the pilots can see outside? Even if it's overwriting itself every few hours or something.. just to keep a record in case of something weird like this.

yeah the area overhead is very literally a training path where they do a lot of circling stuff in small planes. they do have a decent amount of jets flying very high though.

That damaged section is called the nosecone; there's a weather radar behind it.

According to a reddit post the sighting might actually have been due to a fully legal RC field in the area.

https://pay.reddit.com/r/Multicopter/comments/3dqoyh/multico...


I have a question:

At the beginning of the article they author mentions that there is no cell signal once you reach the camp.

Wouldn't a Cessna with a Stingray on board show up on your cell phone as a signal?

It was my understanding that the way the Stingrays works is that they broadcast a pilot signal just like a regular cell tower albeit a spoofed one.

Wouldn't you be able to see that your cell phone all of sudden has x bars signal when you hear or see the Cessna and then that signal would disappear when the Cessna leaves?

Cessnas are not that quiet and they aren't capable of flying that high to the point that you couldn't hear or see them right?

next

Legal | privacy