Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

It's not a leak unless the leaker proves its origin.


sort by: page size:

There is whether those leaks are factual, or not too.

Where it comes from isn't the same thing as what it is.


But if that's not true, how is that a leak? Anyone could have invented that lie.

They didn't leak it. Someone else did.

How's that not an actual leak?

But I think you mean it's not a hack.


It's not a new leak.

Nothing in that article suggests a leak. If maybe your own personal theory, but this article doesn’t support it.

The UDIDs are valid. The leak is certainly real. The claimed source, however, may be suspect.

I was speaking to the possible motivation for the leak.

I certainly didn't intend my reply as a counterpoint to the "if it's not official it's a leak" point.


The data hasn't been made available, so whether or not this qualifies as a "leak" is questionable.

Well, fake leaks aren't exactly uncommon.

if it really is a leak it would be intentional.

It doesn't matter when the leak happened, it only matters when it was formally discovered.

This looks like speculation, not a leak.

Would you mind providing a source for this leak?

It's a leak, so I don't assume we're seeing all sides of the story.

Is it really a "leak" if its officially posted? Yay for sensationalism, by TorrentFreak, not the submitter though.

It is clear from the tweet that it is not a leak. It is from a survey.

If what you're saying is true, then where was the source of the "leak"?

Perhaps you won't say, exactly, without the OP's permission?


Yeah but the data is still a legit leak, even though the means by which is was obtained wasn't hacking.
next

Legal | privacy