Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

He should have trusted support people around to aid him. Is he rich? Does the company he works at care? Why doesn't he have everything he needs?


sort by: page size:

He's carved a life out for himself that works. He has food, shelter, money, and fulfilling work. Why do you assume that he needs people to offer help?

If only there were some website where you could type these questions in and find out...

He has a job doing tech-support which I assume pays for some of his expenses, he also has people who have donated money to his support.


The sad thing is that while he was able to earn $1,500 per month, he apparently didn't invest into anything. No financial planning as if he can do this job forever. Sure he must have known stories what's going on and could prepare for this possibility. I don't understand why he didn't.

Well I mean everybody else is paying for him to survive. Kinda selfish. He should at least get a basic job.

Maybe he has to support a family or relatives - who are you to judge how he spends his hard earned money?

In absence of money, he would be unable to help the relative. The reason why he helped is because it's human to do so. The reason why that was an option is because he had money.

Because it was expensive and it goes against his pride to pay so much money for something he can do himself. Maybe he cared a lot about his self-image as a self-sufficient most-definitely-not-a-spoiled-rich person.

His lifestyle is nothing extravagant. When I said that he's unable to support his lifestyle, I suppose I should have said that he's soon going to be unable to support living at all, without being on welfare, if he doesn't change professions.

He had no job, was working part-time at some place that barely paid $400 a month. His wife pays for most of his expenses.

So many things could have happened, not everyone is able to save up. Also, it's irrelevant - either you want to help or not. Discussing the "impossibility" of his situation is not yours to judge, seriously.

You would think with that amount of money you could get help.

Instead, he was taken advantage of by his hangers-on/ballwashers that were only after his money.


It's a question of focus. He is desperately poor: he's completely broke. He has talents that he needs to focus on making money. My assumption was that he still wants to be an entrepreneur: he needs to learn how to bootstrap on minimal cashflow.

He's not living by the same constraints. For a short period of time, he's limiting ONE constraint out of dozens that a poor person faces.

Reeks of "Hey, look at me (and my company)!!!"


Why do you assume he pays the carers? For that matter, why do you assume he could afford to in the first place?

This seems like a cart before the horse situation. If someone was willing to invest in Grand to educate him to program, why would they also not invest in his overall wellbeing? Why did he have to be continue to be homeless to accomplish this if he had someone helping him out?

He hadn't been one of the richest people on the planet in more than a decade.

Definitely did not have enough money for literally any lifestyle, especially seeing as it appears he owed a lot of money in back taxes.


I'm playing with his dilemma more than anything else, but you could also attack his assertion that the competent don't need his wealth. His children could be competent and unlucky, for instance, which could mean they need a lot of money: chronic illnesses, for example.

I think your comment is appalling. How the hell would you know he is living beyond his means? Maybe there are perfectly legitimate reasons he can't take on extra work. Maybe he is dealing with illness and medical expenses or God knows what.

I have to get away from the keyboard now...


He was making $200k a year, I don't think the best way to support him is to give him another $10k. If he needs money, he needs a LOT more than $10k.
next

Legal | privacy