Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

There is no existential risk now and there might never be. So "stop", especially with the use of violence, is a pretty odd position to take to say it mildly.


sort by: page size:

Why not simply stop?

Hasn't stopped people in the past so I guess why stop now.

Why should it be stopped?

> "Stop" is not regulatory capture.

"Stop" is a fiction that exists exclusively inside your head. Unless your solution anticipates a planet wide GULAG system run by a global government your "stop" is infeasible.


Maybe just stop?

Wouldn't it be a good idea to stop?

I agree. But there is a novel called Termination Shock written by a fairly well known author about the danger involved in just stopping. Don't understand it myself

So... they should just stop?

Stop

STOP

stop

Stop

stop

stop

Stop

Stop

stop

stop

Stop
next

Legal | privacy