Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

Then there's the ongoing weakening of strong verbs.

The past tense of "write" is not "writed". The past tense of "stand" is not "standed".



sort by: page size:

You wrote this in past tense but sadly they're still doing it :(

Meh. Grammar, in general, is on a steep suckiness trend.

For example, when was the last time you saw someone on the web actually use the correct past tense of "lead (verb, transitive)"?


I'm not sure, but I think it is that where a verb itself refers to a past activity, like develop, putting it in the past tense then adding a modifier is a triple whammy, making it ungrammatical.

You wrote in the past tense. Did something change your view?

>Funnily enough you can read the "read" in my sentence above as both present or past tense. It both works but would be pronounced differently.

I hate the recent trend of writing "lead" to mean both "lead" as in "leader" and "led" as in, well, led.

Seems it was just a decade or two ago when the two were used distinctively, but some time in the late '10s it all just became "lead".

eg: "The army is led well by the general." vs. "The army is lead well by the general."


Ah, the past tense has always jarred with me and I now know why. Makes sense. It's going to be hard to eradicate from my technical writing though.

> Then the present and past tense of "lead" would have different spellings in addition to different pronunciations.

They already do have different spellings - lead and led.


Doesn't mean they're right. When did that happen? I had 3 classes on this, and they stressed use of present tense for writing regardless of use along with some other guidelines.

The past tense of "lead" (rhymes with bead) is not also "lead".

When did the word "led" disappear from the English language?


He's confusing the simple past verb form and the participle. In the English weak verbs, they look identical, but they are used in different tense/aspect/voice structures.

Simple Past: He developed. He drank water. Participle: He has developed. He has drunk water.

Claiming that it's ungrammatical in standard English to form a present/past perfect tense/aspect with a helper verb plus the participle...! It's nonsense of the highest order.

This is epic-level peevery.


If you're fond of this rule and want to remember to follow it, just consider how you would write the past tense of the verb.

Ah, I didn't note the past tense. Sorry for my oversight.

Which is why I used the past tense.

Verbs that don't end with -ed in past tense. No rule, you just have to memorise all of them.

With respect to the sister comment, I'd have gone with writing not writings. Also, the sentence "I'm currently in Thailand but I mostly read and write in English for about fourteen years." doesn't strike me as quite right. There a tense switch from present to past without modifying the verb. I'd have probably written 'I've' instead of 'I'.

That said, your written English is excellent and I probably would not have noticed anything if I hadn't been looking for it.


Thanks a lot for the comment. I kind of notice that I overuse past tense a bit too, I'll try to go more with my guts next time. My general lesson: Oftentimes when I try to apply school grammar or logic, I tend to be a bit more off than when I apply the patterns I absorb through experience.

'Writings' is an interesting case. I believe mental lexicon is a lot harder for non-natives to grasp, simply because there are a lot more of them and English does not always treat them consistently. For example, I thought that a collection of written work is plural, while apparently you consider it a collection or an abstract object, and therefore used without an article and cannot in general be in the plural form.

However, this is what I found using Google 'define writing':

  2. written work, especially with regard to its style or quality. 
  * books, stories, articles, or other written works.
  plural noun: writings
  "he was introduced to the writings of Gertrude Stein"
So, dear native speakers, which is more appropriate in my use in the GP comment? writings or writing? :-)

Developed past-tense?

Large corporations and organizations still do this to an unfortunate degree.


FYI, the past-tense of the verb "lead" is "led", not its homophone noun "lead".

I wrote in past tense incorrectly, my grammar isn’t so great.

https://theintercept.com/2018/09/14/google-china-prototype-l...

next

Legal | privacy