It sounds very dramatic, but the fact that the article didn't include even a single quote from the EO to support their argument makes me skeptical. Perhaps it's a real concern, but the article itself is trash.
It really does read like a scare mongering fear article. Including mention of problems but no concrete followup with current details, or at the very least a mention of no resolution to the issue as of a specific time of fact-finding.
I think both the headline is wrong (I don’t see where they explicitly warn people, can someone point it out?) and the interview contains no actual facts. The only statements are "probably" and "I’m not sure"…
I think this article is an example of poor journalism: repeating the claims of the parties concerned without investigating which parts, if any, are bullshit. Sure, the title has an incredulous tone, but the body has no discernable skepticism.
So I've read the article and watched the videos - I haven't seen any actual quotes where any spokesperson had said it was unavoidable outside of the headline and first paraphrased sentence. I only mentioned this initially because it seems like a sensationalized headline of a statement.
It is supposed to be quoting The Times (UK publication?), but the author and article don't seem to exist. It looks like the entire piece is speculation dressed up as fact.
reply