Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

UNIX philosophy is alive and well.


sort by: page size:

AKA the unix philosophy.

really unix philosophy, isn't it?

Now THAT is unix philosophy at its best.

UNIX philosophy. You mean the UNIX philosophy.

The Unix philosophy is based on the idea that, yes. Yes indeed.

So the future is the Unix philosophy.

It fits perfectly in the Unix philosophy.

I like the Unix philosophy: Do one thing, and do it well.

The Unix philosophy seems like a good example of this

THE UNIX FOSS philosophy, hardly seen in commercial settings.

How does this fit in with the Unix philosophy?

Unix philosophy for the business world!

For me at least, unix philosophy is Thompson, Ritchie, Raymond, Stevens, etc., not some obscure commercial things.

Well that or Unix philosophy of do one thing and do it best.

This article is basically describing the UNIX philosophy from a user-facing perspective, right?

It fits the UNIX philosophy just right though.

That's a pretty aggro response. "Unix Philosophy" sounds like a convenient straw-man.

Because the ideas on which Unix is based are sound.

Hell no. Unix philosophy is an empty naive dream.

It was good for its time but right now it can only seduce a young inexperienced student with basic examples that fall apart quickly.

Oh look we can read a file with "cat" then we pipe it into "wc -l" to count the lines just like this "cat file.txt | wc -l" WOW!

Isn't that a genius simple philosophy of "do one thing and do it well?".

It is, but only on a very shallow level.

It is a practice that actively encourages throwing away information. Mangling it up in ad-hoc data structures then relying on more ad-hoc arbitrary text parsing to extract the information.

Then you end up with "cat | awk | sed | tr | perl | kill-me-now --force | bullshit --verbose | xargs crap 2>&1".

It creates problems then wants you to applaud it for solving them with crufty tools?

No thank you.

It was nice for hobbyists sitting behind slow terminals saving keystrokes in the 80s.

It's no longer appropriate today.

A huge percentage of the problems that we deal with today are "artificial" because we have decided not to embrace sane universal methods of data transport/transform at a core level.

So you just have to shovel things back and forth from one subsystem to another.

Today I'd be impressed by a software system/philosophy where each component is in perfect harmony with the others.

An operating system whose state, packages and configuration is stored and managed via a proper database.

Programs that communicate with each other in structured form so every piece of input and output that you need is right there for you to consume.

I could go on but that's enough for now. Phew.

next

Legal | privacy