Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

For many politicians and voters, mere cruelty is the entire point[1] of lawmaking. The government's purpose is to hurt one's opponents, which is more important than helping... anyone.

1: https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2018/10/the-cruelt...



sort by: page size:

Pretty sure the politicians don't want it fair. Politicians don't do fair. It's the worst of humans that are attracted to politics and surviving politics, after all.

Politicians regularly willfully murder their own constituents left & right, willy nilly.

Boo hoo.

I bet some are sad we can’t still use toddlers as naked chimney sweeps.


Regan's "welfare queen" comes to mind. More recent examples were those against stimulus checks (but very much for PPP "loans"). Any politician who believes in means-testing, when the bureaucracy adds an overhead greater than the amount saved is arguably out to hurt the undeserving.

You can't deny the politics of retribution exists, because politicians only give oblique references to it; voters certainly believe it, hence one voter who complained about Covid shutdowns thusly: "He's not hurting the people he needs to be"


Politicians will always do whatever is in the interests of the people or companies giving them votes or donations, so unfortunately without voting for the enemy of your enemy (and maybe convincing others to do so), you don't have any other tool to punish these politicians.

And they need to be punished, just like a good spanking at the right time does wonders for spoiled brats.


Politicians are bad people.

Why with a feral human ? What's wrong with politicians ? They apdo only care about their income source.

The point is to make the people happy that got the current batch of sociopaths into office.

>High ranking member of political party 1 does something illegal.

>Huge stink and nationwide conversation ensues.

>High ranking member of political party 2 does the same damn thing.

>Crickets.

You can even reverse the order of the events or parties. It happens a lot. Such laws, unfortunately, simply become political tools.


> (e.g. murderers, some kidnappers)

And some kinds of politician, I guess.


If you want to judge someone so badly, why not go after the politicians who are creating these despicable policies?

Politicians do bad things, too.

> cowardly politicians

They aren't cowardly; they are responding rationally to a constituency that hates "criminals". Prioritizing fixing discriminatory systems (such as this software, or "stop and frisk", or the death penalty) is bad electoral politics for "tough on crime" politicians.


Hurting innocents in the pursuit of political reform isn't the way to go.

The goal of those types of politicians isn't to make the government less awful. Their goal is to make "the government" out to be the enemy so that the citizens don't start thinking that they can use government to actually offset the power that corporations have (through plain capital and through regulatory capture).

That is the sad part. In politics at least, the end always justifies the means, however horrible/unethical/unlawful it is.

What you're seeing is the "though on crime" trap all politicians fall into. Vote for law X and show you're tough on crime. Oh you didn't vote for law X? Then you're not tough on crime, and that's why votes should go to your opponent in the next election. US politicians MUST be tough on crime or risk losing election.

As long as rich people can buy your politicians, America, your politicians will treat you with disdain.

This is not an isolated instance, this isn't even the most egregious.

Good luck changing it but...


Precisely why politicians showing active commitment to not doing this might deserve a chance.

http://dsausa.org


Don't elect politicians that hate government and will do everything they can to undermine government agencies.
next

Legal | privacy