Economic integration was the main difference between the end of WWI and WWII, and we know how those turned out. One resulted in a horribly burdened and depressed German people. When a charismatic figure who could and would speak to the people emerged (Hitler) preaching nationalistic righteous anger, he rose to power to horrific results for both Germany and the rest of the world. It could have happened to any country in the same boat.
After WWII, the allies learned from their mistakes and instead of saddling the German people with mountains of debt and economic punishment, they sought to rebuild, quickly established trade and economic integration. It went substantially better the second time, and to this day seems to be working.
Compare how Germany was treated by the world after WWI, and after WWII. Big difference in treatment, and consequences for that treatment. Fortunately the lessons of WWI hadn't been forgotten when it came time to cleanup after WWII.
What do you mean horrendous war reparations? Germany remained independent, lost barely any territory and were allowed to delay paying war reparations. Germany's other allies were far worse of losing far more territory and descending into anarchy all the way up to the second world war.
Hitler got into power because of the great depression and the German populations attraction at the time to authoritarian nationalist political party's not because Germany's war reparations were so horrendous.
Yes, and Hitler was just trying to shore up the German economy after a disastrous couple decades. Good thing Europe did such a good job appeasing him and not being confrontational – it would've really sucked if there had been a WWII.
wades in When Hitler battled to power the Weimar Republic was experiencing hyperinflation and the economy had just shut down. I don't think Hitler's ideology was the biggest problem the Germans were facing. As the communist regimes like China and the Soviets demonstrated again after the war, a mismanaged economy is literally worse than Hitler for the people involved.
So I'll admit the situation is too complicated for me to really say this honestly, but the real issue the Germans faced was that they had lost WWI and a bunch of foreign powers were extracting large amounts of wealth from them. They eventually snapped and responded with violence. The fact that the focus when they snapped was Nazi ideology was unfortunate, but the problem wasn't the ideology - it was that foreigners were taking their wealth and the government failed to keep people fed, sheltered and employed.
With so much in stories and history of Hitler, the
Holocaust, The Third Reich, WWII, etc., off and on
for some years I tried to understand what happened
and see if parts of the world or here (in the US)
remain vulnerable to a similar disaster. There
are stacks of history books and many hours of TV. I
boiled it down to:
(1) Authority. At one time, Germany was a battle
ground with the children eating by thawing out
frozen soldiers in the snow. One reaction was
Prussia that became intensely 'militaristic'.
Somehow that Prussian development spread over
Germany and created an 'intensity' and a big respect
for 'authority'. At best there are pros and cons
with that direction, and somehow, on balance,
Germany long went too far.
(2) WWI. That was a disaster. England, France,
Belgium, Germany, Russia, and more suffered.
Finally the US came in and broke the stalemate and
ended it. Yes, the US lost, too. Among all the
suffering, Germany was near the top of the list and,
much of Germany had a hugely bitter reaction.
(3) Versailles. There were 'reparations'. So,
Germany printed money to pay off the reparations
more quickly. Then the inflation ruined the
finances for much of Germany and created more
bitterness.
(4) Democracy. The German efforts at democracy in
the 1920s were clumsy -- more bitterness.
(5) The Great Depression. Sure, the stock market
crash was in the US. So, people had borrowed from
the banks to buy stocks and suddenly had no hope of
paying back. So, the banks went bust. So, the
economy slowed enormously. The 2008 housing crisis
was similar; we did it to ourselves and didn't often
enough see the disaster coming and haven't been very
smart about fixing the problem, and the same song,
first verse was in the 12 years after the 1929
crash. Then somehow the more developed economies
were much more closely linked than one would expect.
So, the US slowed down buying from Germany, and some
Germans lost their jobs; they didn't buy, and more
Germans lost their jobs; they didn't buy from the
US, and more in the US lost their jobs; etc.
(6) Hitler. He was mad, and in particular he was
mad about all the disasters that happened to
Germany. And did I mention, he was mad?
Determined. Ambitious. Ruthless. Can think of
various 'reasons' from his relationship with his
mother, with girls, his struggles in his career, his
WWI experience, etc., but none of these factors has
any 'predictive' power since many others with
similar backgrounds didn't go nuts.
(7) Fertile Ground. Hitler found fertile ground for
organizing and leading, especially leading out of
work, angry, ex-WWI German soldiers. Hitler wanted
to be able to speak and get his followers up on
their hind legs, practiced a lot, and got good at
it.
(8) German Army Politics. The German Army had some
funds for political activities, liked what they saw
in Hitler, and provided just enough 'seed' money to
keep Hitler going in politics.
(9) Communists. In politics it usually can be
helpful to have a visible enemy, and Hitler had the
Communists. And they were also likely a genuine
threat.
(10) Elections. By 1933 or so, Hitler had enough
political followers to start to make some waves in
elections. He didn't do really well, but he did
stay in the game.
(11) Industry. As might be expected, German
industry had some political power. Well, they
thought that Hitler could help them, and Hitler no
doubt was good at playing along. So, eventually
Hindenburg asked Hitler to form a government.
(12) Double Down. Then Hitler and his Nazis were
the government, but they still didn't have much
power. Hitler called for new elections and used the
power he did have to 'stuff the ballot boxes' and do
better in the second election. So, he had more in
the Reichstag, i.e., congress. Then there was some
rough and tumble politics, i.e., before a vote in
the Reichstag some of Hitler's tugs could 'arrange'
that the majority they wanted was present and voting
and the rest were still outside.
(13) Hindenburg Died. Then Hitler got Hindenburg's
job, also, which made Hitler close to a dictator.
E.g., his buddy Goering was head of the police force
in Prussia. Generally his buddies were running
things.
(14) Then, in the words in one of the Star Wars
movies, Hitler pushed through some 'special powers'
for, as I recall, 4 years, to get the economy going
again. Amazingly, he actually did it. So it was
roads, bridges, ships, planes, whatever. The US
should have done as well over the last 4 years. Of
course, it's easier to put people to work when also
have thugs trash the unions and just dictate what
people will get paid -- we don't do such drastic
things in the US. Hitler ran what can be called a
'command economy'. Why most economies run from the
center flop and his didn't, I don't know. But
German industry had reason to be happy with Hitler.
(15) Progress. By 1936 and the Berlin Olympics,
Hitler had Germany looking good, if didn't look too
closely. There was a lot of 'authoritarianism', but
Germany was 'susceptible' to that.
(16) Dictator. Then Hitler got his second term of
special powers, was an absolute dictator, and the
real monster started to come out. "Power corrupts.
Absolute power corrupts absolutely.". Plenty of
people in Germany with good sense saw the threat,
but opposing Hitler was not possible.
(17) Dreams. Hitler had 'dreams'. One of his
dreams was to take over the land to the east,
essentially from Germany to the Arctic, the Urals,
and the Black Sea. He wanted to turn this land into
'farms' owned by Germans and with Slavs as slave
labor on deliberate starvation diets. Everyone else
in that land he wanted just to kill off right away.
So Hitler started making war. E.g., he took half of
Poland and half of France. For war production, he
would turn captured people into slaves.
(18) England. Hitler thought that he could quickly
take England. But before a landing, he had to
defeat the Royal Air Force -- thus started the
Battle of Britain. But Hitler's air force was
really just not up to the job: Both his fighter
planes and his bombers had range too short. Hitler
got angry and tried to bomb London, but his fighters
could not provide protection as far as London, and,
net, in The Battle of Britain Hitler's air force
took unacceptable losses, and Hitler gave up.
(19) Russia. Hitler came close actually to
capturing and holding the lands to the east he had
in mind. But, he got delayed: (A) Stalin was also
running a 'command economy'. So, as Hitler moved
east, Stalin packed up nearly everything of value
and moved it much farther east. (B) As Hitler moved
east, his front grew to be too wide and his supply
lines, too long. (C) Hitler planned badly for the
Russian winter. (D) The Russians regrouped and
pushed back against Hitler and gained time. (E) Due
to events elsewhere, Hitler ran out of time, got
over extended and, basically, was not able actually
to win in Russia. His losses were huge.
Hitler's buddies in Japan declared war on the US, so
so did Hitler, and now he was in a two front war,
with the US, and on a long walk on a short pier.
Hitler was going to take North Africa, move east and
take the Suez Canal and, thus, cut off oil, etc. to
England, and continue to move east and take the
Mideast oil for Germany, but he blew it. First, the
US provided massive supplies to Monty a little west
of Suez. Rommel got pushed back to the west.
England broke the German code, and, thus, much of
Rommel's supplies went to the bottom of the Med. Ike
invaded North Africa, and Rommel went back to
Germany. Hitler's efforts in North Africa were a
bust.
So, Hitler had lost in England, North Africa, and
Russia.
England. The US turned England into an unsinkable
aircraft carrier, and the US Eighth Air Force along
with the Royal Air Force started bombing anything
and everything in Germany. Meanwhile the Russians
were moving west. By D-Day, June 6, 1944, Hitler
was unable to put much of anything into the air.
The Normandy invasion was a great success, in spite
of some cases of hard times, and then it was a fast
charge all the way across France and into Germany.
Germany was getting it from the air, from Russia
from the east, and from the US, England, etc. from
the west.
For the German submarines in the Atlantic, too soon
for Germany the US and England looked at the maps,
blimps, airplanes, radar, sonar, small aircraft
carriers, etc. and from bases in Canada, Greenland,
Iceland, England, etc. had fairly safe passage
across the North Atlantic.
Hitler also had bought heavily into the whole
'eugenics' stuff, Darwin, the image of human
breeding much like dog breeding, etc. and for that
reason, his general resentment and madness, and some
long 'tensions' in Europe, long a very bloody place,
wanted to kill off everyone he regarded as
undesirable. He did a lot, especially in Poland.
It appears that since WWII the main lessons were not
lost on Germany: No more dictators, Nazis, hate
speech, mass unemployment, big inflation, or
militarism. A big social safety net. Work hard and
smart and just do not mess up again.
Could it happen in the US? I'm too afraid it could.
We have to be careful.
Blaming WWI entirely on Germany is myopic, and is in part what set the social unrest in the Weimar Republic in the first place. The huge debt was put on Germany, and they were heavily dependent on loans. When the US economy crashed in 1929, they were done for. If Germany did not take the full blame for WWI, WWII arguably never happened. Because someone like Hitler wouldn't have been able to rise to power via a massive social unrest.
If France and Britain hadn't been such assholes after WWI, I doubt that the Nazis would ever have taken over.
The Nazis actually did a good job getting Germany functional again. That doesn't excuse in any way all the horrible stuff that they later did. But it does explain how they took over.
Watch "Triumph of the Will" sometime, from the perspective of people who had spent over a decade after WWI starving.
It's all just cycle of hate. Just how the abused grow up to be abusers. But on a hugely larger scale.
I think an important part of the story with Germany is that Hitler's rise was substantially aided by the Germany's treatment after WW1. Everybody was aware of the importance of doing a better job this time.
> the Allies could exact revenge and gain incredible wealth + continental power over their biggest economic rivals.
That's what the Germans wanted everyone to believe.
Now, if you compare Versailles (1918) with Brest-Litovsk, Sèvres, or even Versailles (1871) (or even the Septemberprogramm), it's far from awful for the time. Germany had to pay reparations that were in the norm for the period, and lost territories that were basically ethnically either Polish or Danish. It was still the first powerhouse of Europe, and had an intact land- and industrial base, especially in comparison to France or Belgium, where – on top of battle-caused destruction – they carefully destroyed economical infrastructure (e.g. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44575822?seq=3#metadata_info_ta...).
> And the real poverty and unseemliness of the Weimar Republic?
If that's what you learned in your history books, think about changing them. The only thing that led to the infamous economical failure of the Weimar republic is its aversion to pay reparation (~B150$ today) in a normal manner. Instead, they printed stupid amount of money to buy foreign currency to pay reparation with. Of course, this led to a monetary crash – out of wich Germany promptly got out by simply switching to a better handled new mark[1,2,3,4]. It was a pure product of the hopeless German economic policies, that they went back to being the economic powerhouse of Europe as soon as they got their duck in a row, and the difficulties they met thereafter were the baseline for all the nations after the war[5,6].
Germany went through a similar phase after 1945 with a lot of guilt and reparations towards fixing all the problem cause during the war. It was very noticeable in behavior and attitude, through around 2000s it seems that the past is being put behind them.
We should not forget that world war 2 happens, but it also doesn't make much sense for Germans to continue self-flagellation forever. If anything, the lessons learned by the period between world war 1 and world war 2 is that lasting peace is not about trying to fix every past injustice by never ending reparations. It is not feasible to create a world as if world war 2 did not occur, and at some point people has to accept the past and work as a single group, like say a European union rather than Europe vs Germans.
I have to agree with everything you said from my study of WWII, but just providing some elaboration.
"(3) Versailles. There were 'reparations'. So, Germany printed money to pay off the reparations more quickly. Then the inflation ruined the finances for much of Germany and created more bitterness."
Some of the Allies were going to make the same mistake in WW2 with repartitions once again. The French wanted to take the Ruhr, the industrial heartland in Western Germany and annex it into France. Other ideas were to make Germany an agrarian society. The primary reason the US created the Marshall Plan was to ensure the reparations and the initial dismantling of the German Industry (later repealed) that were forced on Germany (mostly the taking of IP, such as patents) would not cripple it and make it fall into the hands of the Soviets[1].
"(8) German Army Politics. The German Army had some funds for political activities, liked what they saw in Hitler, and provided just enough 'seed' money to keep Hitler going in politics."
The army did sort of a bittersweet deal with Hitler. Most of the army was not fond of Hitler, but they did see him as a way to restore their faded glory. They made their "deal with the devil" though when they agreed to take an oath to Hitler in return for Hitler dismantling the SA, which the Army saw as thugs and did not want integrated into the army (who thought of themselves as principled and aristocratic). Much of the army took that oath quite serious as well due to the Prussian tradition of loyalty to their country and leader--believing that betraying the oath was to betray their country. However, elements of the military still thought Hitler was mad all the way back to 1938 and had plotted to kill Hitler[2]. However, the capitulation of the UK and France in Czechoslovakia[3] and the later invasion of Poland quieted most of the planning to assassinate Hitler for the time being.
Also anyone who has not seen them, I reccomend the BBC's Fall of Eagles[4], BBC's The Great War[5] and the BBC's World at War[6]. Watching them back to back explains quite a bit about how the 19th Century Monarchies led to WWI and how WWI led to WWII.
Although this is HN and we should not discuss politics, just a few points.
Firstly, the Nazis may have been bad – but the treatment of post-WW1 Germany was bad and a causing factor of WW2.
The Treaty of Versailles ensured in effect that there will be another war in Europe. I think that Germany was uniquely the only country in the 20th century to receive such a hard “punishment” (both economically and culturally) when they lost the First World War.
Japan lost the war, yet they still can not educate their population about the horrors performed in Korea and China. They pretend nothing happened. That kind of response does not foster forgiveness. Germany on the other hand _really_ have taken a responsible path after the war, and I also believe there is an understanding (at least in northern and western Europe) that a big part of the blame that Hitler could take power was on the victors of the first world war (England and maybe more France).
I guess better forgiveness for German aggression are due to good behaviour from post-war Germany, okay education in north and western Europe, and also that Germany behaved _relatively_ good on the western front. Of course it will take longer for eastern Europe mostly due to the extreme ugliness of the eastern front, and the huge economic differences.
World War II wasn't unavoidable. If the West, particularly France, had pursued a less vindictive peace with Germany after the first world war, the circumstances that brought Hitler to power would not have existed. Specifically, the unsustainable reparations on Germany, and the French decision to occupy the German coal regions in the 1920s, destabilized the German economy and destroyed the Weimar Republic.
Germany was the 1930's equivalent of the USA in roughly comparable industrial output, the difference is that instead of creating a nicer society they gambled that they could overrun all of Europe by redirecting that output towards a war machine. The scary thing: their gamble almost worked.
Here's another view, from the economist John Maynard Keynes (of Keynesian economics fame), regarding the devastating reparations that were imposed by the Allies on Germany after the end of WW1:
...Keynes began work on The Economic Consequences of the Peace. It was published in December 1919 and was widely read. In the book, Keynes made a grim prophecy that would have particular relevance to the next generation of Europeans: "If we aim at the impoverishment of Central Europe, vengeance, I dare say, will not limp. Nothing can then delay for very long the forces of Reaction and the despairing convulsions of Revolution, before which the horrors of the later German war will fade into nothing, and which will destroy, whoever is victor, the civilisation and the progress of our generation."
Germany soon fell hopelessly behind in its reparations payments, and in 1923 France and Belgium occupied the industrial Ruhr region as a means of forcing payment. In protest, workers and employers closed down the factories in the region. Catastrophic inflation ensued, and Germany's fragile economy began quickly to collapse. By the time the crash came in November 1923, a lifetime of savings could not buy a loaf of bread. That month, the Nazi Party led by Adolf Hitler launched an abortive coup against Germany's government. The Nazis were crushed and Hitler was imprisoned, but many resentful Germans sympathized with the Nazis and their hatred of the Treaty of Versailles.
A decade later, Hitler would exploit this continuing bitterness among Germans to seize control of the German state. In the 1930s, the Treaty of Versailles was significantly revised and altered in Germany's favor, but this belated amendment could not stop the rise of German militarism and the subsequent outbreak of World War II.
That alone wasn't the cause: what enabled their success (as far as their ability to rebuild their war machine) was the ineffectiveness of the enforcement of those reparations, and the victors simply allowing the German economy to build more war materiel. Debilitating reparations can be done, but you have to maintain military power and use it to prevent the losing nation from refusing to pay, or building up its military again. The victors failed to do this and the result was another war. Honestly, I'm not sure what they were thinking. It's like throwing people in prison with hard labor for a crime, and then leaving the prison doors and gates wide open and firing all the prison guards and expecting the inmates to not escape.
After WWII, the allies learned from their mistakes and instead of saddling the German people with mountains of debt and economic punishment, they sought to rebuild, quickly established trade and economic integration. It went substantially better the second time, and to this day seems to be working.
reply