Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

Familiar with asbestos? Its pretty widely regarded as a bad time

https://www.asbestos.com/exposure/automobiles/



sort by: page size:

Huh? Asbestos has been known to be harmful for a long time.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asbestos#History_of_health_conc...


>is asbestos really that bad?

Yes and no.

There's a lot of other nastier industrial products. Asbestos is in the public consciousness as particularly bad because it was used widely before we know it reliably caused cancer.

That said, it also reliably gives people cancer so it's bad reputation is not exactly undeserved.


So basically it could be bad. Right now there is little evidence it's anywhere near the concern that asbestos is, but we don't know for sure.

> There are forms of asbestos that are really not all that dangerous to the general public

Source?


Thanks for the link. Seems strange that this industry would be singled out considering that asbestos exposure seems really limited.

> mesothelioma is very bad and does not require heavy, prolonged exposure — brief or low-level exposures have been linked to mesothelioma.

Link?


Asbestos isn't even properly banned in US despite of universal knowledge of it being harmful: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asbestos#United_States

Asbestos is only a problem if you inhale a reasonably large amount of it.

Are you suggesting that the health risks of asbestos were known when it started to become widely used?

If not, you missed the point of my comment.


I really don't think I'm saying anything controversial here:

'Most people who develop asbestos-related diseases have worked on jobs where they frequently breathed in large amounts of asbestos fibres.'

'A very small number of asbestos-related disease cases occur each year in people who have not worked with asbestos products.'

http://www.health.gov.au/internet/publications/publishing.ns...


Asbestos was used everywhere, that's not proving that it's safe in any way...

To provide something of a counterpoint, asbestosis is a disease from the modern society, filled with opportunity. So is being run down by a car, hit by an air-to-ground missile, or blinded by a laser.

It's not quite so one-sided as it might at first appear.



I mean this really happened though: asbestos was exactly this problem.

The effects of ingesting asbestos were known a long time before this.

The reason so many people got cancer was bad information from the government that led to rescue workers not using proper protective equipment.

https://publicintegrity.org/politics/epa-misleads-on-air-qua...


So much asbestos!

The awful thing is is that when this video was being made, the dangers of Asbestos were already known and had been established decades earlier. Some of the applications don’t even make all that much sense, and are very much a case of trying to foist whatever you’re able to produce onto a gullible public.

Capital owners and governments could conceivably have used the substance in a responsible way without exposing workers and consumers to additional risk, but it would probably have lowered their appetite for spreading it all over the environment if they had borne the costs upfront.

Considering that they used to make vehicle brake linings out of the rotten stuff until the late 20th century, it’s clear that no such attempts were made. Even though the first documented death was in 1906.


Yeah, they call it asbestos.

Asbestos in brakes is bad but it's a not really a concern even from. Chinese pads anymore, but there are still lots of harmful things they give off even still. Asbestos is just well known.
next

Legal | privacy