Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

It is funny when you know neither A or B in A is the B of C claims.


sort by: page size:

He's not making that claim, merely pointing out that the claim isn't mutually exclusive to the other claim.

So to sum it up this exchange:

Person1: A

You: This sounds like B, which is fallacious.

Person2: A

You: Again...this sounds like B, which is fallacious.

Me: No one is claiming B

You: I never said anyone claimed B. I said this sounds like B.

Sound about right?


Obviously I meant to say that's not my claim :)

Just taken a bit off guard: do you not dispute the other claim?

Hah! Fair enough, but my point was that those claims aren't legitimate. Especially those claims about C

these are not mutually exclusive claims

Step two is to demonstrate how these claims don't apply to the other choice.

  NON SEQUITUR
  Claim A is made.
  Evidence is presented for Claim A.
  Therefore, claim C is true.
http://www.logicallyfallacious.com/index.php/logical-fallaci...

Unproven Claim A is true for the same reason that Unproven Claim B is true.

Speaking of claiming things without proof...

That's a claim, not a proof.

Which negates the statement “neither can claim to be true”.

You make a claim without substantiating it.

Claiming it does not make it so.

That is

a) not the same as the original claim

b) not evidence


While not applicable for all claims, some can be verified by consistency. For example, claims a and b cannot both be true if a is inconsistent with b, and this hold regardless of who claims a or b.

Asserting something does not make it true.

Did they make a claim that is not true?

No, A says it does, and you claim B says, without presenting evidence.
next

Legal | privacy