Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

Surely, there are many realistic ways to abuse this powerful technology, the creation of a self-aware Paperclip Maximizer is not necessarily required.


sort by: page size:

Very much not necessary. You clearly haven't played the paperclips game.

Well the point is that you do not need to; it would just be an optimization opportunity.

The user isn't required to use it - it's an option

You don't need AI for that anyway.

Perhaps it is, but you don't have to reproduce the work of your direct colleagues.

Perhaps, but you don't have to know or care about that that to use it.

Those 3 methods aren't at all necessary for most objects you'll create and use.

We don't need it, so we don't use it. I think it's fantastic that it's possible, and I think that if you do need it, it's great to have it.

Why? There's no need to use some game-theoretic machine for getting data when you can just get it direct from the source.

You don’t need AI for something that is on the surface anyway.

As with almost all things, YOU DON'T HAVE TO USE THAT FEATURE.

Well-designed or not, it exists, and sometimes you just want to use it, without a lecture on how it's suboptimal.

The whole point of the post was exactly not using it, so it doesn't matter how simple or complex it happens to be.

You don't need AI tor that.

It's also not generally necessary.

Most use cases there is just no need.

Just because the features exist does not mean you have to use them.

Sure, it is, and that's why you may not require one. But I can see why people would want that, even with no malicious intention, which was your question :)

Or by hand. Does not mean there's no value in a streamlined solution.
next

Legal | privacy