The reason it's a "bad idea" is that most surge protectors are power strips and you must be cautious when you daisy chain power strips. Likewise extension cords.
Why? Two reasons: You have to ensure the wire gauge on every link can handle the current, and at every junction (plug) the resistance is higher than in the wire itself. When electrical fires start they usually start at these plug junctions because they overheat.
The surge protectors themselves don't mind being daisy chained.
It's not very different from daisy chaining normal extension cords - safe if you know what you're doing (not exceeding the current rating on any of them). Most surge protectors are fused, making them safer to daisy-chain than normal extension cords.
I've never found a straight answer on whether it's ok to daisy chain surge protectors. Anyone know? I've been trying to avoid it based on a warning I don't understand, but it can be tough to find power bars without surge protection.
I don't see the problem, provided that you are within the current draw limits.
Surge protectors are usually made of components that cause a short when a surge happens, protecting the equipment downstream. It usually pairs with some kind of overcurrent protection (breaker, fuse, sometimes GFCI) to protect against the short the surge protector itself caused.
Having chained surge protectors it actually quite common. You may have a surge protector in your breaker panel, then in your powerstrip, then in the power supply of the device you have plugged in. Most good quality ATX power supplies have built-in surge protection for instance. They also all tend to have overcurrent protection too. The breaker panel has breakers (duh), the power strip may have a simple breaker too, and the device may have a fuse. In the UK, the plug itself may have a fuse, plus the breaker from the utility company.
The risk from chaining surge protectors is that it increases the risk of false triggers if one of them is defective. But it may also provide better protection. All in all, I wouldn't worry too much about it. Just don't overload that power bar and whatever it is plugged in.
Our fire guy didn't like the unfused kind of extension cords much. One can understand why, you overload the electric lead and hope that the breaker is thrown before the insulation burns through.
It's sorta like plugging your PC into the wall plug next to it, and plugging your toaster into the wall plug in your kitchen...Yea, it would be easier to daisy-chain surge protectors from 1 outlet, but that's so messy. Like interior design layout, like circuit design layout?
And (I think) the copper circuits are so close that quantum leaps can occur -- electrons can just decide to jump from one piece of copper to another, straight through silicon or anything else, simply because the copper is so close. This means a VCC line can be giving charge to an unpowered neighboring circuit or memory cell without magnetically affecting it.
probably because it Depends, If you dont know its safer not to.
long answer (keep in mind i live in canada, im not a professional, this is just what i learned and trust, keep in mind above)
- As long as no wire/bar exceeds its max Amp your safe no matter how many things are plugged in or how long of a daisy chain, the max amp is usually listed.
- all devices should list the max amp they use, add up the amp's of all the devices connected to that wire and if its below your safe.
- if your breaker is 15 amp, virtually all normal extensions/power bars are rated for at least 15 amps which means doesnt matter what you do the breaker should* flip before any damage is done
- if breaker is above 15 amp most surge protectors have protection that will trigger if they exceed their max, most basic "splitters" and extension cords dont, eg if they dont have a switch or reset button they are pretty much guaranteed to not have this protection, be extra carful how much you load on those.
some good rules of thumb to keep in mind, look for imprints or labels that list amps, smaller wires can handle less, damaged wires can handle less then they did before and shouldn't be used, if a wire or connector warms when its in use its overloaded reduce the load on it, especially if it warms quickly.
here is a video that i liked that talks about it as well
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_q-xnYRugQ
The "load rating" on the cords exceeds the total power delivery capability of the system. It has its own circuit breakers.
The manufacturers are well aware of risks, for liability reasons if nothing else, and have contained them in the uniform-electrical-code mandated manner. The system is no more risky than any other plugged-in appliance. We don't need to invent problems. Extension cords are just extension cords.
Yeah, the risks mainly come with extension cords, like plugging a bunch of 10A appliances into a single 20A outlet via a 10A rated extension cord with multiple 10A outlets.
Appliances themselves with their own input fuses and captive cables are less risky, although some kind of internal wiring short could still get all melty.
It's true that sizing the plugs that way does prevent you from plugging a 20A appliance into a 10A extension cord, which makes sense.
I don't even think this would work without disconnecting from the main source via your breaker, so workers down stream are perfectly safe.
And I don't see how putting 10-15 amps through a cord, plug, and outlet that routinely handle 15 amps downstream everyday causes a fire risk. My house doesn't freak out when I operate a space heater, and I don't see why it would freak out if I push a space heaters power through that exact same setup.
The cord is dangerous, in the sense that you could get shocked by your generator. You can get shocked by the thousands of rusted, rewired, half functioning generators on Craigslist without every using a cord like this.
I believe the question is if it's safe at all to do so rather than whether the protection works or not, though I'd have to be all ears about interactions between multiple parallel surge arrestors.
Why would the cable/socket overheat if it's within spec? I thought that was the whole point of using fuses in the first place.
Roll-out extension leads are extra dangerous though, even if fused. I have a relative that had to jump out of a second floor window on a construction site when someone set all of their batteries charging on a wrapped up extension lead, which rapidly started a fire. I assume it happened faster than the thermal cutoff could trigger.
Hmm.. I wouldn't trust that "2,500W power distribution strip", or the extension cord itself, to actually be safe when you have a fridge, living room appliances and the induction cooktop pulling 1.2KW all at once. Fire waiting to happen.
The necessity of using a fused plug to protect the in-wall wiring in a ring circuit is (IMO) terrible.
The NEC does have restrictions on the size of a breaker supplying different types of receptacles. 20 amps through, say, a 18AWG extension cord shouldn’t be that dangerous as long as the cord uses high temperature insulation. But your point is good: a fuse protecting the cord would be a very sensible feature. (Even better would be ground and/or arc fault protection in the cord, but that gets expensive.)
"surge protector" is what Americans call a passive device that splits one outlet into several, yeah?
The danger is overloading. Back in the days when the main things you plugged in were incandescent lights and space heaters, this was probably a big issue. With computer equipment and LED lights you have to have a lot more stuff - many outlets' worth - to reach the circuit's maximum capacity.
If the circuit and "surge protectors" are rated for 1800W (15 amps x 120V), officially you should limit yourself to 80% of that for continuous loads which is 1440W, so you can supply 14 laptops or small small desktops that use 100W each, or over 200 raspberry pis on USB chargers that use 5W each, and either way you're going to need a lot of outlets before you come anywhere close to that limit.
At least that's a rough estimate. Power factor could decrease that number by up to 50% and you can use the full rating for intermittent loads; I'm not certified to know the fine print. Point is that 10 computers can easily use less power than a single space heater.
A better unsafe solution is to upgrade the breaker without upgrading the wiring or outlet. Breakers are usually $5-10 and most wiring won't burst in to flame from an extra 5 amps.
Note that fuse-in-plug does not keep you from overloading a circuit; it only helps when the device itself malfunctions.
Disclaimer: sometimes it will burst in to flames. You shouldn't actually do this.
Yup. But that
engineering issue is the responsibility of the designers of the DC/AC converter "box"!!!
> Then you have the issue of protecting the 120V loads. You can get more than 20A of current out of the alternator, which pushes what you can safely put through standard extension cords.
Naw!!! The car's alternator charges the car's 12 Volt battery, and the DC/AC converter "box" takes the 12 Volts from the battery and makes 120 Volts AC available at the female output sockets. So, if I plug the male end of an extension cord into one of those sockets and connect the female end of the cord to the male end of a power strip with female sockets and have my office lights and electronics, the "loads", connected to the power strip, no more current will flow in the extension cord than is requested, as usual, by the loads. A cord that can carry 16 Amperes, at 120 Volts, would be moving
16 * 120 = 1920 Watts
As I type this, my office is drawing 52 Watts. With my server with its 8 core AMD processor and my laser printer, still looking at a lot less than 1920 Watts. And the printer gets only occasional use and then for only seconds at a time.
The DC/AC converter has more than one female socket supplying 120 Volts, and from that and an ordinary extension cord could drive the refrigerator, toaster, and microwave oven -- again much less than 1920 Watts.
If I start to overload the DC/AC converter, not very likely for my loads and a converter that can supplyk 4000 Watts, I trust that the converter will have a circuit breaker. In that case, this approach to emergency electric power should be not much more of a safety challenge than normal usage.
Note in all of this, the circuit breaker in the house does not get involved, remains ON, and waits for the utility power to come back on. Then the lights in the kitchen, front hall, etc. will come back on, and I will plug my office and kitchen loads into the wall sockets again, disconnect the DC/AC converter, put the car back in the garage, wind up the extension cords, make some notes, and f'get about the outage!
One little issue is: If the Web server computer was running when the power went out, might there be a way to have power to that computer not be interrupted all the way until the power comes back on? Yup: With some shopping, can run the server computer off another box, not very big, that has a little battery inside that can keep the computer running for a few minutes while I switch over to the DC/AC converter and again while I switch back to the utility power.
For the Hacker News audience, this is conversation is drifting into kindergarten level talk:
I'm SURE Hacker News has MANY very well informed engineers on how to have un-interruptible electric power to computers in a server farm and also to the whole farm.
For more, once I wrote a math paper on detecting zero day problems, gave an invited talk at the NASDAQ headquarters, and got a tour and overview of the engineering they did for un-interruptible NASDAQ service, uh, including a remote backup server location. Such magnificent engineering has long been available.
Here I am just trying to contribute to the issue of this thread, using the engine in a car to supply standard 120 Volt A/C electric power. I'm just mentioning that for short term power outages, maybe only a few hours at a time, should be able to do okay with just a normal car and a little box that can supply 4000 Watts of 120 Volt A/C power from a 12 Volt DC battery. That's all I'm trying to do.
I believe that it highly depends on the type of the surge protector, their ratings and the cable network involved. I do not think that it would cause issues in two surge protectors from power outlets connected in series, and depending on their rating and switching characteristics maybe both could trigger, I agree.
Why? Two reasons: You have to ensure the wire gauge on every link can handle the current, and at every junction (plug) the resistance is higher than in the wire itself. When electrical fires start they usually start at these plug junctions because they overheat.
The surge protectors themselves don't mind being daisy chained.
reply