Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

5 digits? early 2000s? Does not compute...


sort by: page size:

4 and 5 digits? Please

That is nice and everything, but why 5 (five!) digits for the years?

That's not even the right number of digits, incidentally.

As a 5-digit user - uh oh!

This is a cool idea. Although isn't 5 digits a little limited?

No - spec calls for 6 digits.

You’re right, I can’t remember why I was thinking I ran into 11 digits...

10 digits? You need to go back to kindergarten and relearn counting.

I assume they were talking about in the past. Like a decade ago or earlier. Though 6 digit ones selling for thousands still seems a bit much unless they were appealing rounded numbers. 5 digits for thousands of dollars was def a thing in the mid 00s.

Mine's a seven-digit, starting with 5. I have no idea what that dates it to.

Thank you! This is actually incredibly helpful in putting this into context. Reading your original posts, I somehow expected to see 5 to 6 digit numbers, as opposed to the 4 to 5 digits that you quoted.

I'm less than 50 and remember 5-digit numbers being the norm in the 80s. 3 digit might have still been around in the 70s iirc.

Surely the whole thing is full of digits?

I think what they're getting at is that it has 11 digits internally but only displays the significant ones even though it has more 'under the hood'.

10 digits isn't long enough for that to work.

Some work, did you try greater than 5 digits like the post said?

Sorry, not applicable here. I'm still on single digits, seven to be exact.

If they had only used 4 digits, then in eight thousand years or so, longbets.org would have felt really stupid about having to hire a historical programming re-enactor to show us how our ancestors used to adjust the width of a database column.

But luckily they used 5 digits. 5 digits should be enough for anyone.


5-numbers. And yes, this e-beg cr*p shouldn't be on HN.
next

Legal | privacy