Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

If it's wiped then there's no data for them to get?


sort by: page size:

to what my dude? is this data still accessible or is it being systematically wiped?

No, they'll delete the data and say they have none.

Even if it's wiped?

They could claim the wipe was to protect voter privacy though, in which case one would expect them to make the data unrecoverable.

I doubt they actually deleted the data.

Their About page suggests that it's just that the data will be deleted.

As the article indicates, the data wasn't destroyed, just obscured. Maybe equivalent for some users, but somewhat overstating things, especially here.

I highly doubt it and derived data are actually deleted, it merely stops you from being able to view it.

I don't quite follow your point. We didn't lose their data, we never had it.

what if they lose data ?

Doubtful they will destroy data. Instead, it will most likely be a flag that's flipped to indicate "deleted" status.

That's assuming they actually delete the data though.

They'd lose their source of data

How so? No data is destroyed, just kept private.

Cannot comment in too much detail as not sure how much information is public but tape backups are also in scope for wipeout and user data is removed from them.

No way that data isn't already destroyed...

This is Uber, who designed systems for remotely wiping entire offices when they thought that the data might be called for by the authorities.

Perhaps there will be unexpected 'issues' meaning that such data will have been lost in this case.


They're most likely deleting it. There's not much point in them hosting all that data when it costs money to do so.

They are probably not explicitly lying about what information they retain. If they say they deleted it, well, it's probably at least inaccessible to production systems.
next

Legal | privacy