you simply have a tool which extracts the text, transforms it however you please, and then puts it back as an image.
Then you still need some way to handle text, and image to text is not reliable.
Text simply has so much more distilled information. Images are nice for humans, but I can't imagine them as a storage format for programs.
Is it time to admit that simply storing everything as an image is the future?
Sure, it isn't technically as neat, but it gives far more flexibility. It happens already in memes (where text is usually part of a gif)
Text and text encoding dates back from the days when every byte of storage space mattered. Now lossless high resolution images are the norm, and wouldn't constrain what symbols could be included. If you want to make a word be slightly bendy for style, you can!
Accessibility, relayout, etc. can all be done with images too - you simply have a tool which extracts the text, transforms it however you please, and then puts it back as an image.
The text to image results look pretty awesome, but I feel like they all have a "neural net" quality to them. Whilst the style transer results come out more unique. Do you think it would become possible to combine the two techniques? Eg. Generate me a pic of this text, but in this images style?
Really impressive. If we are able to generate such detailed images, is there anything similar for text to music? I would I though that it would be simpler to achieve than text to image.
That's true. But, it's also completely possible to make a machine learning algorithms to separate "real text" (text meant for human to human communication) from text encoded images since they differ in significant ways. Granted, you could always try to make a text encoding format which resembles real text, but I'm fairly sure the machine learning algorithm could be constructed in such a way to make its usage unfeasible.
How do you generate the original image? And what about the subsequent images, do they come automatically from the text? I'd love to know more about the process.
reply