Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

On small planes, landing gear is not retractable.


sort by: page size:

There are plenty of small planes with retractable gear.

The reality is that it doesn't really matter. Landing gear-up is almost always survivable - for the people at least :-)

Distracting someone with trying to find and operate the landing gear would probably be as likely to cause problems as it would be to help.


that really makes me curious.. so can you retract landing gear if you’re not airborne? is there not a sensor to prevent this?

WOW! How is this even possible?

I would have thought that it would/should be almost impossible to retract the landing gear on the ground.

Given an aircraft will fly with the gear down, all be it little less efficient/aerodynamic.


Planes are designed to land without or with partial landing gear. That's the redundancy.

Landing gear?

More like landing gear.

With no landing gear, it can only land on soft surfaces without damaging itself. The pilot's visibility is compromised during landing making it dangerous to set down near any infrastructure that will kill you.

You porpoise the landing. The front gear in just about every aircraft is not intended to take the weight that the rear can. End up in an unstable oscillation, until it gives.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NMmHYWjEmkY


The wheel well is not accessible from the plane. And of course the pilot would lower the gear when landing, they are not going to do a belly landing and destroy tens of millions of dollars of property and risk everyone on board's life to try to save one stowaway.

You never retract the landing gear on the shakedown flight. I remember seeing this watching a documentary on the X-35 and X-32 prototype fighter jets.

There have been several cases of the landing gear up/down lever getting wired backwards during maintenance. Not to worry, the gear has a 'squat switch' sensor that prevents the gear from being raised when the plane is on the ground. Unless you taxi over a bump and the switch decides it's now airborne. Crunch.

Planes don’t brake (except for a brief moment while landing), so no.

That landing gear only extends when the nose gear is off the ground. It's really just to prevent a tail strike. An alternate choice would be a little extra wheel up on the tail, as was done with the Concorde.

That's not an automated landing system failure, that's a landing gear failure.

Don’t the landing gear have sensors in them to measure how heavy the plane is?

> if a (weight) load is detected on the landing gear

This state "weight on wheels" is used in a lot of other functionality, not just on military aircraft, as the hard stop for things that don't make sense if we're not airborne. So that makes sense (albeit obviously somebody needed to actually write this function)

Most obviously the gear retraction is disabled on planes which have retractable landing gear.


I'm not involved with the airline industry in any way, but I would think that since landing gear is a highly mechanical, moving piece with plenty of failure points, airliners are probably designed with a margin of error to withstand gearless landings without loss of life.

How does a plane lose its front landing gear?

There are similar (but more basic) systems built into some retractable gear aircraft. They generally provide an audible alert if the plane appears about to land but the gear is still up.

Pilots still land gear up, even with the alarm sounding. There is (or at least was) even a public (YouTube) video of this happening from a passenger filming.

Landing a plane is not difficult (source: I’m a pilot) but there’s a lot going on. This is clearly a UI/UX issue but innovation is relatively slow in the certified market.

next

Legal | privacy