Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

Parts of Princes Street are accessible to only buses and taxis but there are also parts which are universally accessible which aren't covered.


sort by: page size:

In general it appears that it's just roads that aren't publicly accessible which one can't go down. It's not just Downing Street, for example, but a bunch of pedestrianised places, presumably for the obvious reason that the Street View car couldn't go down them.

There's minimal car access during business hours to the walled part of York: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/York#Transport

Hence “most” not “all” backstreets.

For example in soho Frith street could be fully pedestrianised, while the neighbouring greek street only accessible to taxis


That tells me there aren’t enough such thoroughfares in London, so they’re being funneled from other streets to Oxford St. Also IIRC (it’s been a while since I was last there) the buses don’t yet have right-of-way through the intersections.

Edinburgh council should be ashamed of Princes Street, it's truly awful. During the whole time I lived in Edinburgh and when visiting I avoided it like the plague. I think I only visited Princes Street about four times (once to buy a mobile phone :) and the others for work and an interview). The real gem is George Street, but council seem to be doing there damnedest to make a mess of that as well.

The Royal Mile is a bloody awful tartan covered tourist trap despite having some fantastic buildings.

My favourite part of Edinburgh is Leith and the shore area. I lived just off of the bottom of Leith walk and always loved dawdling across Leith Links to work in Great Michael house.


For those who aren't aware, bus lanes like this are often the only roads passing through city centres in the UK. The surrounding area is often a pedestrian area, with the only traffic being buses, registered taxis and emergency vehicles (delivery and utility vehicles are allowed in the early morning). The alternative route for regular traffic would be a few miles longer - which could mean 30 mins or more at rush hour.

I don’t see King’s Road as being a good example. King’s Road has a lot of traffic and the pedestrian experience is very poor.

If you read the article it actually says why Streatham High Road is not included.

This street has many highrise offices, universities and residential buildings around it so its a destination of a lot of foot traffic from buildings, not so much somewhere you drive to access. There are also multi level parks on the ends, you just can't drive through it.

Many one-way / no-entry streets in Manchester specifically have ("except cycles") on them, not sure about London.

E.g. https://www.google.com/maps/@53.4423463,-2.190167,3a,75y,71....


Are you saying London doesn't have crosswalks? I find that hard to believe.

If you're standing on the street, I'm sure you can see where the bus/trams etc are.

Especially since some of those side streets don’t exist

I lived in London. You have streets everywhere exactly for that odd moment when any of those services need access.

Yeah I wish I could find a better picture bit this gives a sense of Edinburgh centre.

https://www.nfpplanning.com/uploads/2/4/0/5/24056719/taxi-tr...

Queues of buses, and during the day they will often only have one or two passenger.

Plus car drivers are advised to give a bike the same room as a car, so on mixed use roads a bike effectively takes up the same space as a car.


I recall when I worked for a while in Edinburgh a 20 min walk from princess st was considered out in the boon docks.

And Edinburgh's are smack-bang in the middle of Princes Street Gardens, which is staggeringly unlikely unless they're subterranean...

Maybe English motorways, but not many buses on there!

Bar the main roads, there’s not a lot of traffic down residential streets in London.
next

Legal | privacy