Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

Id imagine one would want to analyze the matter to decern that its composition is conducive with the transplantee, though perhaps thats not strictly necessary.


sort by: page size:

Presumably you perform chemical analysis rather than looking for globs of the stuff.

I would expect the chemistry to be characterised well enough to the point where you shouldn't need clinical tests to know it's degredation profile...

I think you'll still need to carefully prepare the samples.

Someone mentioned this before, but the problem is the tests might not work due to the dilution of the samples.

Surely that would show up in chromatography tests.

Why not take samples and process that instead? No need to look at all of it.

That last part is interesting to me, how would you test the nutrient solution after circulating? Would you just pay a lab to run the analysis on what's left or evaporate the solution to increase concentration and then try to precipitate the ions left in the solution and weight those?

Getting a SEM would be the easy part. The hard part would be sample preparation and interpreting the results.

GPT-derived content is going to be watery and thin, too, though. The value of it for the OP is likely as much in human curation as anything else.

The extraction process maybe

substrates matter.

Totally, but you could get a pretty big starting point vs knowing nothing. Especially if it is composed of organic compounds, you have a chance of deciphering some of the molecules.

My big hedge - I am not sure the specs of a 40 year old MS. Unit resolution is probably the best case scenario along with super limited m/z range. Interrogating a sample would be much harder than today.


Because he already has a sample and it doesn't hurt to check other properties of it.

I think all they have to do is send a sample to another lab to analyze.

Apparently, people feel it's pretty easy to make, but in any case, if they have a sample they can see if it has the claimed properties and analyze what it's made of.


I was thinking more along the lines of something like salt to which you could theoretically add an adulterant. Now what that would be without making the end result unpalatable is beyond my knowledge, but with the right financial incentives, I assumed someone could identify something.

It’s usually going to be diluted in something if my spouse’s experience with this subject still holds true.

From there you’re measuring concentration, which opens a host of options from community labs to minimal test kits.


It could also be good for cosmetics, as they're heterogeneous and probably pretty consistent. Although it would be limited to checking brand authenticity rather than interrogating composition

How do they know that the sample wasn't contaminated?

Yes, but you are only doing chemical analysis of the liquids, not the solids.
next

Legal | privacy