Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

>So, ex-KGB automatically means you were born to be an evil sadist?

no, it means you were successfully trained to be one.



sort by: page size:

tl;dr: I'm betting: "And while the biggest arms dealer in the world is your boss, the President of the United States, who ships more merchandise in a day than I do in a year... sometimes it's embarrassing to have his fingerprints on the guns. Sometimes he needs a freelancer like me to supply forces he can't be seen supplying. So ... you call me evil. But unfortunately for you, I'm a necessary evil."

Context:

>Jack Valentine: Are you crazy? Or just plain delusional? I don't think you fully appreciate the seriousness of your situation! You are gonna spend the next ten years of your life going from a cell to a courtroom before you even start serving your time!

> Yuri Orlov: [Quietly] My family has disowned me. My wife and son have left me. And my brother's dead. I can assure you I appreciate the seriousness of my situation. But I promise you- I won't spend a single second in a courtroom.

> Jack Valentine: [Scoffs] You are delusional.

> Yuri Orlov: I like you, Jack. [Considers] Well, maybe not, but- I understand you. Let me tell you what's gonna happen. This way you can prepare yourself. Okay. Soon there's gonna be a knock on that door and you will be called outside. In the hall there will be a man who outranks you. First, he'll compliment you on the fine job you've done, that you're making the world a safer place, that you're to receive a commendation and a promotion. And then he's going to tell you that I am to be released. You're going to protest... you'll probably threaten to resign. But in the end, I will be released. The reason I'll be released is the same reason you think I'll be convicted. I do rub shoulders with some of the most vile, sadistic men calling themselves leaders today. But some of those men are the enemies of your enemies. And while the biggest arms dealer in the world is your boss, the President of the United States, who ships more merchandise in a day than I do in a year... sometimes it's embarrassing to have his fingerprints on the guns. Sometimes he needs a freelancer like me to supply forces he can't be seen supplying. So ... you call me evil. But unfortunately for you, I'm a necessary evil.

[Valentine now looks very grim, realizing Orlov is right. There is a knock at the door just as Yuri promised.]

> Jack Valentine: [Getting up] I would tell you to go to Hell, but I think you're already there.


> who ARE all these sad, scheming paranoiacs?

Same, it's puzzling to me what is the mechanism that creates people like this.


>Most large scale evil is done by career obsessed freaks.

He didn't say that most career-obsessed freaks are doing large scale evil.


> I know myself. I'm a hacker, right? I can reprogram my body to accomplish anything.

Is there a name to that way of thinking? That's how I've been thinking lately but I can't help but think it's wrong.


>> "Why would the ex-CIA guy hurt his current employer to help his former?"

Once you're a made man in an intelligence service, you're in for life, regardless of whether or not your name appears on the official payroll.


The 'Big Brother' thing doesn't shock me, I know about it for some time now. At least you can still believe a modicum they maybe have good intentions... You know, protecting us from bad guys or something...

But the 'MiniTruth' thing... Wow,just wow...

Context: The Ministry Of Truth in the 1984 novel is the service dedicated to propaganda, in which the whole society is drowned. Everything about the society they live in is a lie...

It just blows away any hope of good intention from their part.

The last time I read about something so cynic, suggesting so much contempt for the people they pretend to serve, with such carelessness, is when it was revealed que FTX internal chatroom was called 'Wirefraud'.


>ex startup CEO, schizophrenic and ex-inmate. Where should do I go next

>Are there other misguided people like me?

Strictly considering logical progression, looks like you would have recognizable preparation for modern politics next.


>I was put in a similar situation at one time: I was read-into a top secret program

No you weren't.


> He sounds very humble.

psychopaths work very hard at this.


> I would not be surprised if he's a psychopath.

When I first heard of him, his behavior and how people described him that was my first thought. It ticks all the boxes:

- „nicest guy I know“, knows intuitively what people want to hear

- is extremely good at fooling others, and can uphold a fake story for a long time

- does it for narcissistic reasons, and to enrich himself with no deeper goal in life

- adept at building alliances with people in power (the guy who got him was afraid he would be fired)


> I learned my lesson to not talk about such things because their egoes were too fragile.

At my university in the early 90s I went the white hat route and had tons of fun. I managed to convince the computing center folks to give me a student job in the Unix group, and then spent the next three years hacking their systems and getting a pat on the back when I did it.


> Why should the person committing the crimes be let go?

Because a child calling a helpdesk and pretending to be someone else is a prank. Slap on the wrist, followed by a job offer. It seems on a similar level to ringing a bar and asking for 'Amanda Hugginkiss' or 'Mike Hunt'. At least this kid found the problem before the Russians did.


> It can (and usually does) mean that the same number of bureaucrats achieve all-new levels of intrusiveness.

Well, this turned dark pretty fast huh.


> traitor to the hacker culture

I don't understand the weird disconnect between HN and the intelligence community. It's almost the perfect job for a 'hacker' type: work with cutting edge technology and thousands of other incredibly intelligent people to try and out-think adversaries to gain access to their resources. You get to build defensive and offensive software to attack computer systems, and actually use it, something that would get you arrested if you did it personally. This was why I loved penetration testing, and an obvious extension of financial security would be working in national security. Yet somehow, these guys are 'evil' now, notwithstanding the IRA and otehrs in the UK, the 9/11 and 7/7 attacks, and so on - those were all perpetrated by _actual_ evil people, who deserved to be investigated and followed and found. And, looking at the leaked documents, there is a huge amount of auditing and checking - don't do this, because it's illegal, don't search for that because it's against the law - not the wild west free-for-all that people seem to imagine.

Anyway, if I could get a clearance, I'm sure I'd love working for GCHQ or SIS in the infosec arena, as would most hackers. The cognitive diasonance is strong in many people!


>The criminal networks are pretty sophisticated.

I’ve had to relay this on to people I train: It’s their job. It’s a business and it’s unreasonable for you to be better at aspects of it than they are.

I think the slide is titled “Someone is going to be the goose, hopefully not you”.


> Could've done something good with his life (like getting into info/cybersec!).

Very likely no, he could not. Being able to harm people does not imply ability to secure systems. Nor ability to learn advance tech while we are at it. Nor ability to obey contractual limits if you are red team.

And it would be pretty idea to employ person with such a bad judgement in any of those positions anyway.


> How can we be sure that you're not?

If I could summon Satan all over somebody's hard drive I doubt Uncle Sam would let me remain in the private sector.

> Do you own a possessed violin, by any chance?

No, but this sword here at my side don't act the way it should. It keeps calling me its master when I feel like it's slave. It's hauling me, faster and faster, to an early, early grave.


>you'll find they're generally smart capable human beings who want to do good work

Or authoritarian types that want to torture people.


>which is probably going to cause these people to die.

source? My understanding is that spy stuff is a giant circle jerk where high-IQ bored people sit around taking tax-payer dollars.[1] Why would they kill each other? That just ends the game.

what makes you think anyone kills spies anymore?

[1] you'll literally hear them make statements like "Hey, I thought this was going to be interesting! I'm just sitting around listening to other people's boring conversations all day." Well yeah that's what you signed up for.

next

Legal | privacy