Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

Tyranny is a bit overstated.


sort by: page size:

Tyranny definitely has a negative connotation

Not sure you’re using the right definition of tyranny

The same could be said for tyranny.

What tyranny exactly?

I think possibly we have different definitions of tyranny

"Tyranny"? Really?

tyranny is other people

What you’re describing is much closer to tyranny.

Tyranny

So then, tyranny.

a.k.a. Tyranny.

Yeah, I was looking for this comment before I created another. Surprised by how little Tyranny has been mentioned.

Define tyranny in the sense that you meant this?

What you describe is neither cruel nor oppressive I think "tyranny" misses the mark.

Tyranny is progressive.

Agreed that it is a bit too far. Emphasis on the bit.

It is a de-facto dictatorship and it is tyrannical by many definitions.


Well, you made through three quarters of the comment before typing 'sheeple'. That's gotta count for something.

Your first statement I tend to agree with, though 'tyranny' is a strong word often implying rule by a single person.


Tyranny that way leads.

That can be considered a form of tyranny, but that is a completely different discussion.
next

Legal | privacy