Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

This is only because "regular people"/travelers are not used to alphanumeric flight "numbers". As highlighted in this article: change can be hard.


sort by: page size:

How does the flight number matter so much either.

>a flight number seems like an immaterial bookkeeping abstraction

Not when it comes to airline operations. Crews are assigned to flight numbers; changing their assigned flight number, even to the same route/city-pair, constitutes a schedule change, which requires a recalculation of all their duty hours. When operations are all fubar and your crews are out of position you cannot afford to limit your options. Ergo, changing the flight numbers often has knock-on effects related to the crew regulations that are best avoided.


> But even those get reused from week to week (even day to day?)

It's quite normal, especially in the US

> United 1644 operates BDL-IAD-IAH-MCO, yet BDL-IAD operates as a 737-800, IAD-IAH operates as a 757-200, and IAH-MCO flies with a 757-300.

https://www.southwestaircommunity.com/t5/Southwest-Stories/T...

Looks like that specific flight number is no longer a multi segment.


Even as a 100K flyer this shit is extremely confusing to me. No wonder the airlines are so screwed up.

I capitalized "Airlines" for a reason, but I would guess it's pretty representative for the country. The reason your number and my number are different is not because AA is an unusual airline, but because the two numbers are about completely different things. There are three groups of Americans: (A) those that don't fly in a given year, (B) those that fly once, and (C) those that fly multiple times. Roughly, your number is A/(A+B+C) while mine is B/(B+C).

It's likely expecting IATA style flight numbers, which would all be two letters (or a letter/number) airline code, followed by some amount of numbers.

Four digit flight numbers starting with 9 are often "extra sections" which are not ordinarily scheduled.

https://www.travelersunited.org/today/whats-an-extra-section...


That could explain why on my last few flights boarding was done according to random-seeming letters. At least you can't guess them that easily.

They did not test-run the code change against a database of the names of previous fliers?

Because if the change reduced some passengers to "can't be booked" I think that should raise some flags.


Well, guess I wasn’t “most people”.

Also, I only included the IATA code to show that the code matches the name and isn’t random/unrelated (like CYXU).


The calculator they base the plane numbers from seems off. Not counting passengers/plane or something.

I just looked up a flight on Delta's site. I entered the flight number, or what most people would consider the flight number. "DL133" Delta darius it was an invalid number. Turns out they just wanted "123" how hard would it have been for them to strip the leading "DL"? Apparently to hard

I think they meant "flight number including two-letter prefix". But even those get reused from week to week (even day to day?) so might be different models.

Please stop.

Oh wait. Flight number is 804: 8 + 0 + 4 = 12

66 people aboard: 6 + 6 = 12

Must mean something!


> Yeah well, it might help to always make the first two or three characters unique, then you can be certain it always works without having to check the list. Realism is kept that way.

Unfortunately these two are fundamentally at odds. In real life the call signs are based on carrier (or tail number if no call sign is assigned). In the current iteration, there are two airlines, United (all of the UAL flights) and British Airways (all of the BWA flights), plus the Cessna "airline" that mimics general aviation craft by prefixing the call sign with "N".


The airline doesn't like it because it enables ticket arbitraging. (That's the reason they're fixed to your name) Also for tracking (err security.. but that's not really their fault)

Doesn't work with every flight number. Not sure what the criteria is.

Turkish Airlines has a specific flyer they give to all their flights originating from Turkey and Europe to USA that asks people to write 1 and 7 in a specific way in the customs form. I guess that explains why.

My guess is that it works for certain airlines. I tried the three next flights fromthe local airport. Some of those are just one letter and three numbers. That makes it pretty hard to make assuption regarding the meaning of the code, without having a reference.
next

Legal | privacy