Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

Well, it's an atypical VC, as policy his firm does funding rounds of $100,000 and greater up to a more standard 5 million.


sort by: page size:

Just came here to submit this. It's a fascinating development. He's pulling an end-run around mid-level VCs.

Tim has a good eye for startups + the ability to personally boost their efforts + get them publicity. Now he can get them money without the hassle of individual negotiation with investors.

Can someone more knowledgeable comment: is there a maximum amount of money this can be used for? Or could this conceivably be used for much larger rounds as well?


It's a VC firm.

VC funded no less.

He's got a VC fund called Obvious (mentioned in the post). If you want to know more details their portfolio is listed here:

https://obvious.com/portfolio


VC funding.

$40 million in VC money.

I think, he meant a VC fund will be worth 100m. and then it will fund 100 startups, with 1 mil each. VC's will be looking at aggregates, to present to their LP's.

That particular VC was on the board of directors of an incubator program which did small $20K rounds.

VC funding :)

It’s VC-funded…

I think the "VC funded" title is misleading: In the article he says "We’ve got quite some money as a seed investment from a VC."

His money is in real estate investments. Might not be tech VC, but an investor is still an investor.

Isn’t he operating a VC fund? Shouldn’t he just be doing capital calls for the fund when needed versus sitting on cash typically?

Note that the article is talking about VC-scale (think 10s/100s of million in revenue).

It's pretty common for VCs to have the company being invested in pay for legal/research/etc. expenses out of the investment amount -- so you raise $500k and immediately pay $50k back to the VC for their costs.

It's weirder here due to the small scale of investment relative to the costs, and the non-cash services, but not totally implausible.


1.5 is small compared to the war chests Apollo, KKR and the like amass, but it's huge for a VC accustomed to writing smaller checks. Average US VC find is 107mm.

They're either going to be doing way more deals or shifting some of the fund focus to later stage. I expect the former, given that investors seem to like the granularity of separate venture and growth funds to pick from.


The VC was "in another realm", so presumably he doesn't fund startups like this one at all.

You specifically reference funding, so I would assume he's referring to VC capital allocation.
next

Legal | privacy